The authors regret that in the acknowledgments section, the sentence
“We are very grateful to the parents of the enrolled babies, to the midwives and to all the local CUAMM staff of the St. Luke Catholic Hospital in Wolisso (Ethiopia) for their support during this study.”
should have read
“We are very grateful to the parents of the enrolled babies, to the midwives and to all the local CUAMM staff of the St. Kizito Hospital in Matany (Uganda) for their support during this study.”
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 20, 2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Back rubs or foot flicks for neonatal stimulation at birth in a low-resource setting: A randomized controlled trialResuscitationVol. 167
- PreviewApproximately 15% of infants require stimulation in low-resource settings, but data on effectiveness of different stimulation approaches are limited. We aimed to compare two recommended approaches of stimulation (back rubs vs. foot flicks) in reducing the need for face-mask ventilation in newly born infants who were not crying immediately after birth in a low-resource setting.
- Full-Text
- Preview
