The authors regret that there is an error in Table 2 of the above article. The error is in the footnote of the table where the word “hours” was mistakenly used rather than “days”.
The correct version of Table 2 is below.
Table 2Characteristics and outcomes of 13 ECPR-treated cases.
| N or median (% or IQR) | |
|---|---|
| Demographics | |
| Age | 54 (48, 60) |
| Female sex | 2 (15.4%) |
| Cardiac Arrest Characteristics | |
| Initial Shockable Rhythm | 10 (76.9%) |
| Bystander Resuscitation | 10 (83.3%) |
| EMS Witnessed | 1 (7.7%) |
| Public Location | 9 (69.2%) |
| Time to EMS Arrival | 6.22 (4.72, 8.80) |
| Time to ALS Arrival | 11.38 (9.16, 16.31) |
| ROSC and rearrest | 4 (30.8%) |
| Hospital Care | |
| 9-1-1 to ECMO Flows, min | 63 (57, 71) |
| Door-to-ECMO, min | 22 (18, 28) |
| Initial Lactate | 12.10 (8.85, 16.50) |
| Initial pH | 7.01 (6.86, 7.17) |
| Days on ECMO | 1.03 (0.23, 2.03) |
| Days in Hospital | 1.11 (0.26, 15.32) |
| Etiology | |
| Coronary Artery Disease | 5 (38.5%) |
| Electrolyte Abnormality | 1 (7.7%) |
| Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy | 2 (15.4%) |
| Aortic Stenosis | 1 (7.7%) |
| Aortic Dissection | 1 (7.7%) |
| Malignancy/Pneumonia | 1 (7.7%) |
| Presumed illicit substance overdose | 1 (7.7%) |
| Unclear | 1 (7.7%) |
| Hospital Discharge Outcomes | |
| Survival | 2 (15.4%) |
| Favourable Neurological Status | 2 (15.4%) |
| Organ Donor | 1 (7.7%) |
EMS, emergency medical services; ALS, advanced life support; ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
1 Sum of ECMO treatment for all cases combined was 15.9 days.
2 Etiology determination based on clinical care and autopsy results.
The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 19, 2021
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
