Advertisement
Rapid response systems| Volume 169, P31-38, December 2021

Moderating effects of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest characteristics on the association between EMS response time and survival

  • Clara E. Stoesser
    Affiliations
    Departmentof Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Justin J. Boutilier
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
    Affiliations
    Departmentof Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, WI, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Christopher L.F. Sun
    Affiliations
    SloanSchool of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    HealthcareSystems Engineering, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Steven C. Brooks
    Affiliations
    LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Departmentsof Emergency Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sheldon Cheskes
    Affiliations
    LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Departmentof Family and Community Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    SunnybrookCenter for Prehospital Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Katie N. Dainty
    Affiliations
    Instituteof Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    NorthYork General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Michael Feldman
    Affiliations
    SunnybrookCenter for Prehospital Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dennis T. Ko
    Affiliations
    Instituteof Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Institutefor Clinical Evaluation Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada

    SchulichHeart Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Departmentof Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Steve Lin
    Affiliations
    LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Instituteof Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Departmentof Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Laurie J. Morrison
    Affiliations
    LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Departmentof Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Damon C. Scales
    Affiliations
    LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Instituteof Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (IHPME), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Institutefor Clinical Evaluation Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Timothy C.Y. Chan
    Affiliations
    Departmentof Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    LiKa Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      Although several Utstein variables are known to independently improve survival, how they moderate the effect of emergency medical service (EMS) response times on survival is unknown.

      Objectives

      To quantify how public location, witnessed status, bystander CPR, and bystander AED shock individually and jointly moderate the effect of EMS response time delays on OHCA survival.

      Methods

      This retrospective cohort study was a secondary analysis of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Cardiac Arrest database (December 2005 to June 2015). We included all adult, non-traumatic, non-EMS witnessed, and EMS-treated OHCAs from eleven sites across the US and Canada. We trained a logistic regression model with standard Utstein control variables and interaction terms between EMS response time and the four aforementioned OHCA characteristics.

      Results

      102,216 patients were included. Three of the four characteristics – witnessed OHCAs (OR = 0.962), bystander CPR (OR = 0.968) and public location (OR = 0.980) – increased the negative effect of a one-minute delay on the odds of survival. In contrast, a bystander AED shock decreased the negative effect of a one-minute response time delay on the odds of survival (OR = 1.064). The magnitude of the effect of a one-minute delay in EMS response time on the odds of survival ranged from 1.3% to 9.8% (average: 5.3%), depending on the underlying OHCA characteristics.

      Conclusions

      Delays in EMS response time had the largest reduction in survival odds for OHCAs that did not receive a bystander AED shock but were witnessed, occurred in public, and/or received bystander CPR. A bystander AED shock appears to be protective against a delay in EMS response time.

      Keywords

      Abbreviations:

      AED (Automated external defibrillator), AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), CI (confidence interval), CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation), EMS (emergency medical services), OHCA (out-of-hospital cardiac arrest), OR (odds ratio), PAD (public access defibrillation), ROC (resuscitation outcomes consortium)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Resuscitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Weisfeldt M.L.
        • Everson-Stewart S.
        • Sitlani C.
        • et al.
        Ventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac arrest in public versus at home.
        New Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 313-321
        • Sasson C.
        • Rogers M.
        • Dahl J.
        • Kellermann A.
        Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3: 63-81
        • Hollenberg J.
        • Herlitz J.
        • Lindqvist J.
        • et al.
        Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with an increase in proportion of emergency crew--witnessed cases and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        Cirtulation. 2008; 118: 389-396
        • Hasselqvist-Ax I.
        • Riva G.
        • Herlitz J.
        • et al.
        Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        N Engl J Med. 2015; 372: 2307-2315
        • Rajan S.
        • Wissenberg M.
        • Folke F.
        • et al.
        Association of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival according to ambulance response times after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Circulation. 2016; 134: 2095-2104
        • Bürger A.
        • Wnent J.
        • Bohn A.
        • et al.
        The effect of ambulance response time on survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An analysis from the German resuscitation registry.
        Deutsches Ärzteblatt Int. 2018; 115: 541
        • Pell J.P.
        • Sirel J.M.
        • Marsden A.K.
        • Ford I.
        • Cobbe S.M.
        Effect of reducing ambulance response times on deaths from out of hospital cardiac arrest: cohort study.
        BMJ. 2001; 322: 1385-1388
        • De Maio V.J.
        • Stiell I.G.
        • Wells G.A.
        • Spaite D.W.
        Ontario Prehospital Advanced Life Support Study G. Optimal defibrillation response intervals for maximum out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2003; 42: 242-250
        • Goto Y.
        • Funada A.
        • Goto Y.
        Relationship between emergency medical services response time and bystander intervention in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7e007568
        • Valenzuela T.D.
        • Roe D.J.
        • Cretin S.
        • Spaite D.W.
        • Larsen M.P.
        Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interventions: a logistic regression survival model.
        Circulation. 1997; 96: 3308-3313
        • Larsen M.P.
        • Eisenberg M.S.
        • Cummins R.O.
        • Hallstrom A.P.
        Predicting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a graphic model.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1993; 22: 1652-1658
        • Stiell I.G.
        • Wells G.A.
        • DeMaio V.J.
        • et al.
        Modifiable factors associated with improved cardiac arrest survival in a multicenter basic life support/defibrillation system: OPALS study phase I results.
        Ann Emergency Med. 1999; 33: 44-50
        • Keeffe C.
        Role of ambulance response times in the survival of patients with outof-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Emerg Med J. 2011; 28: 703-707
        • Brooks S.C.
        • Simmons G.
        • Worthington H.
        • Bobrow B.J.
        • Morrison L.J.
        The PulsePoint Respond mobile device application to crowdsource basic life support for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Challenges for optimal implementation.
        Resuscitation. 2016; 98: 20-26
        • Tay P.J.M.
        • Pek P.P.
        • Fan Q.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of a community based out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) interventional bundle: results of a pilot study.
        Resuscitation. 2020; 146: 220-228
        • Olasveengen T.M.
        • Mancini M.E.
        • Perkins G.D.
        • et al.
        Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.
        Circulation. 2020;
        • Sun C.L.F.
        • Karlsson L.
        • Morrison L.J.
        • Brooks S.C.
        • Folke F.
        • Chan T.C.Y.
        Effect of Optimized Versus Guidelines-Based Automated External Defibrillator Placement on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Coverage: An In Silico Trial.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9e016701
        • Karlsson L.
        • Hansen C.M.
        • Vourakis C.
        • et al.
        Improving bystander defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests at home.
        Eur Heart J: Acute Cardiovascular Care. 2020; (2048872619891675)
      1. Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry (Cardiac Epistry) Version 1 and 2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/roc_cardiac_epistry_1_2/. Published 2018. Accessed 2019.

      2. Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry (Cardiac Epistry) Version 3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/roc_cardiac_epistry_3/ Published 2018. Accessed 2019.

        • Azur M.J.
        • Stuart E.A.
        • Frangakis C.
        • Leaf P.J.
        Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?.
        Int J Methods Psychiatric Res. 2011; 20: 40-49
        • Li P.
        • Stuart E.A.
        • Allison D.B.
        Multiple imputation: a flexible tool for handling missing data.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 1966-1967
        • Rubin D.B.
        Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. vol. 81. John Wiley & Sons, 2004
      3. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing; 2013.

        • Hosmer Jr, D.W.
        • Lemeshow S.
        • Sturdivant R.X.
        Applied logistic regression. 398. John Wiley & Sons, 2013
        • Hothorn T.
        • Bretz F.
        • Westfall P.
        Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.
        Biometrical J Biometrische Zeitschrift. 2008; 50: 346-363
        • Investigators P.T.
        Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 637-646
        • Scquizzato T.
        Cardiac arrest detection through artificial intelligence-based surveillance camera: a working prototype.
        Resuscitation. 2018; 130e114
        • Chan J.
        • Rea T.
        • Gollakota S.
        • Sunshine J.E.
        Contactless cardiac arrest detection using smart devices.
        NPJ Digital Med. 2019; 2: 1-8
        • Sana F.
        • Isselbacher E.M.
        • Singh J.P.
        • Heist E.K.
        • Pathik B.
        • Armoundas A.A.
        Wearable devices for ambulatory cardiac monitoring: JACC state-of-the-art review.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 1582-1592
        • Berg D.D.
        • Bobrow B.J.
        • Berg R.A.
        Key components of a community response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Nature Rev Cardiol. 2019; 16: 407-416
        • Boutilier J.J.
        • Brooks S.C.
        • Janmohamed A.
        • et al.
        Optimizing a drone network to deliver automated external defibrillators.
        Circulation. 2017; 135: 2454-2465
        • Cheskes S.
        • McLeod S.L.
        • Nolan M.
        • et al.
        Improving Access to automated external defibrillators in rural and remote settings: a drone delivery feasibility study.
        J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9e016687
        • Nichol G.
        • Thomas E.
        • Callaway C.W.
        • et al.
        Regional variation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome.
        JAMA. 2008; 300: 1423-1431