Advertisement
Clinical paper| Volume 160, P94-102, March 2021

Analyze Whilst Compressing algorithm for detection of ventricular fibrillation during CPR: A comparative performance evaluation for automated external defibrillators

      Abstract

      Objective

      The aim of this study was to present new combination of algorithms for rhythm analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in automated external defibrillators (AED), called Analyze Whilst Compressing (AWC), designed for decreasing pre-shock pause and early stopping of chest compressions (CC) for treating refibrillation.

      Methods

      Two stages for AED rhythm analysis were presented, namely, “Standard Analysis Stage” (conventional shock-advisory analysis run over 5 s after CC interruption every two minutes) and “AWC Stage” (two-step sequential analysis process during CPR). AWC steps were run in presence of CC (Step1), and if shockable rhythm was detected then a reconfirmation step was run in absence of CC (Step2, analysis duration 5 s).

      Results

      In total 16,057 ECG strips from 2916 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients treated with AEDs (DEFIGARD TOUCH7, Schiller Médical, France) were subjected patient-wise to AWC training (8559 strips, 1604 patients) and validation (7498 strips, 1312 patients). Considering validation results, “Standard Analysis Stage” presented ventricular fibrillation (VF) sensitivity Se = 98.3% and non-shockable rhythm specificity Sp>99%; “AWC Stage” decision after Step2 reconfirmation achieved Se = 92.1%, Sp>99%.

      Conclusion

      AWC presented similar performances to other AED algorithms during CPR, fulfilling performance goals recommended by standards. AWC provided advances in the challenge for improving CPR quality by: (i) not interrupting chest compressions for prevalent part of non-shockable rhythms (66–83%); (ii) minimizing pre-shock pause for 92.1% of VF patients. AWC required hands-off reconfirmation in 34.4% of cases. Reconfirmation was also common limitation of other reported algorithms (25.7–100%) although following different protocols for triggering chest compression resumption and shock delivery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Resuscitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Perkins G.D.
        • Travers A.H.
        • Berg R.A.
        • et al.
        ILCOR CoSTR part 3: adult basic life support and automated external defibrillation.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 95: e43-69
        • ILCOR C.
        AHA CoSTR ECC-PICO on Minimizing pauses in chest compressions.
        ([cited 2020 Jun 10]. Available from:)2015
        • Kleinman M.E.
        • Brennan E.E.
        • Goldberger Z.D.
        • et al.
        Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: S414-35
        • Perkins G.D.
        • Handley A.J.
        • Koster R.W.
        • et al.
        European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2015 section 2 BLS.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 81-99
        • Cheskes S.
        • Schmicker R.H.
        • Christenson J.
        • et al.
        Perishock pause: an independent predictor of survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest.
        Circulation. 2011; 124: 58-66
        • Cheskes S.
        • Schmicker R.H.
        • Verbeek P.R.
        • et al.
        The impact of peri-shock pause on survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest during the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium PRIMED trial.
        Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 336-342
        • Sell R.E.
        • Sarno R.
        • Lawrence B.
        • et al.
        Minimizing pre- and post-defibrillation pauses increases the likelihood of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
        Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 822-825
        • Jost D.
        • Degrange H.
        • Verret C.
        • et al.
        DEFI 2005: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of automated external defibrillator cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocol on outcome from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Circulation. 2010; 121: 1614-1622
        • Beesems S.G.
        • Berdowski J.
        • Hulleman M.
        • Blom M.T.
        • Tijssen J.G.P.
        • Koster R.W.
        Minimizing pre- and post-shock pauses during the use of an automatic external defibrillator by two different voice prompt protocols. A randomized controlled trial of a bundle of measures.
        Resuscitation. 2016; 106: 1-6
        • van Alem A.P.
        • Post J.
        • Koster R.W.
        VF recurrence: characteristics and patient outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Resuscitation. 2003; 59: 181-188
        • Shanmugasundaram M.
        • Valles A.
        • Kellum M.J.
        • Ewy G.A.
        • Indik J.H.
        Analysis of amplitude spectral area and slope to predict defibrillation in out of hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) according to VF type: recurrent versus shock-resistant.
        Resuscitation. 2012; 83: 1242-1247
        • Soar J.
        • Callaway C.W.
        • Aibiki M.
        • et al.
        Part 4: advanced life support: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 95: e71-120
        • Gliner B.E.
        • White R.D.
        Electrocardiographic evaluation of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients.
        Resuscitation. 1999; 41: 133-144
        • Telesz B.J.
        • Hess E.P.
        • Atkinson E.
        • White R.D.
        Recurrent ventricular fibrillation: experience with first responders prior to advanced life support interventions.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 88: 138-142
        • Conover Z.
        • Kern K.B.
        • Silver A.E.
        • Bobrow B.J.
        • Spaite D.W.
        • Indik J.H.
        Resumption of chest compressions after successful defibrillation and risk for recurrence of ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014; 7: 633-639
        • Berdowski J.
        • Tijssen J.G.P.
        • Koster R.W.
        Chest compressions cause recurrence of ventricular fibrillation after the first successful conversion by defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010; 3: 72-78
        • ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association
        2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2005; 112: IV1-203
        • Jost D.
        • Hong Tuan Ha V.
        • Trichereau J.
        • et al.
        Contributing factors to early recurrence of ventricular fibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational retrospective study.
        Resuscitation. 2020; 154: 19-24
        • Berdowski J.
        • ten Haaf M.
        • Tijssen J.G.P.
        • Chapman F.W.
        • Koster R.W.
        Time in recurrent ventricular fibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: 1101-1108
        • Didon J.-P.
        Method, apparatus and computer program for defibrillation delivery decision.
        ([cited 2020 Jun 11]. Available from:)2016
        • Didon J.-P.
        Method, apparatus and computer programme for defibrillation delivery decision.
        ([cited 2020 Jun 11]. Available from:)2010
        • Krasteva V.
        • Jekova I.
        • Dotsinsky I.
        • Didon J.-P.
        Shock advisory system for heart rhythm analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a single ECG input of automated external defibrillators.
        Ann Biomed Eng. 2010; 38: 1326-1336
        • Didon J.-P.
        • Krasteva V.
        • Ménétré S.
        • Stoyanov T.
        • Jekova I.
        Shock advisory system with minimal delay triggering after end of chest compressions: accuracy and gained hands-off time.
        Resuscitation. 2011; 82: S8-15
        • Hu Y.
        • Tang H.
        • Liu C.
        • et al.
        The performance of a new shock advisory algorithm to reduce interruptions during CPR.
        Resuscitation. 2019; 143 (Elsevier): 1-9
        • Fumagalli F.
        • Silver A.E.
        • Tan Q.
        • Zaidi N.
        • Ristagno G.
        Cardiac rhythm analysis during ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the Analysis During Compressions with Fast Reconfirmation technology.
        Heart Rhythm. 2018; 15: 248-255
        • de Graaf C.
        • Beesems S.
        • Stickney R.
        • et al.
        Analysis of the heart rhythm during chest compressions: performance in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
        Resuscitation. 2019; 142 (Elsevier): e9
        • Kerber R.E.
        • Becker L.B.
        • Bourland J.D.
        • et al.
        Automatic external defibrillators for public access defibrillation: recommendations for specifying and reporting arrhythmia analysis algorithm performance, incorporating new waveforms, and enhancing safety. A statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association Task Force on Automatic External Defibrillation, Subcommittee on AED Safety and Efficacy.
        Circulation. 1997; 95: 1677-1682
        • de Graaf Corina
        • Beesems Stefanie G.
        • Stickney Ronald E.
        • Chapman Fred W.
        • Koster Rudolph W.
        Abstract 32: chest compression fraction increased when police used AED that analyses heart rhythm during CPR.
        Circulation. 2019; 140 (American Heart Association. A32–A32)
      1. IEC 60601-60602-4:2010+AMD1:2018. [cited 2020 Jan 13]. Available from: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/62752.

        • Aramendi E.
        • de Gauna S.R.
        • Irusta U.
        • Ruiz J.
        • Arcocha M.F.
        • Ormaetxe J.M.
        Detection of ventricular fibrillation in the presence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation artefacts.
        Resuscitation. 2007; 72: 115-123