— H. James Harrington
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ResuscitationAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation-Review of the last 25 years and vision for the future.Resuscitation. 2017; 121: 104-116https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.09.029
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Task Forces. https://www.ilcor.org/about-ilcor/task-forces/. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- Part 1: executive summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2015; 132: S2-S39https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000270
- Part 1: executive summary: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. 2015; 95: e1-e31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.039
- Part 2: evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2015; 132: S40-S50https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000271
- Part 2: evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. 2015; 95: e33-e41https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.040
- Effectiveness of different compression-to-ventilation methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review.Resuscitation. 2017; 118: 112-125https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.032
- 2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations summary.Circulation. 2017; 136: e424-e440https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000541
- 2017 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary.Resuscitation. 2017; 121: 201-214https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.10.021
- 2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations Summary.Circulation. 2018; 138: e714-e730https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000611
- 2018 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations summary.Resuscitation. 2018; 133: 194-206https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.017
- 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces.Circulation. 2019; 140: e826-e880https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000734
- 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. 2019; 145: 95-150https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.016
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. ILCOR website home page. https://www.ilcor.org/home. Accessed August 11, 2020.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Continuous evidence evaluation guidance and templates. https://www.ilcor.org/documents/continuous-evidence-evaluation-guidance-and-templates. Accessed August 11, 2020.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). What is behind ILCOR? YouTube page. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7l9cwLX6Ec. Accessed August 11, 2020.
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Consensus on science with treatment recommendations. https://costr.ilcor.org/. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- Eden J. Levit L. Berg A. Morton S. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC2011
- Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 6.0. Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses.2019 (https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-10. Updated July 2019. Accessed March 17, 2020)
Cochrane Training. Introducing systematic reviews of prognosis studies to Cochrane: what and how? https://training.cochrane.org/resource/introducing-systematic-reviews-prognosis-studies-cochrane-what-and-how. Accessed August 11, 2020.
Cochrane Methods Screening and Diagnostic Tests. Handbook for DTA reviews. https://methods.cochrane.org/sdt/handbook-dta-reviews. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- GRADE Handbook.in: Schünemann H. Brożek J. Guyatt G. Oxman A. 2013 (Accessed August 11, 2020)
PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) website. http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.BMJ. 2009; 339: b2535https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Generic SR workflow. https://www.ilcor.org/data/generic_sr_workflow.xlsx. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- ILCOR Scientific Knowledge Gaps and Clinical Research Priorities for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Consensus Statement.Circulation. 2018; 137: e802-e819https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000561
- ILCOR Scientific Knowledge Gaps and Clinical Research Priorities for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: A Consensus Statement.Resuscitation. 2018; 127: 132-146https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.021
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.BMJ. 2016; 353: i2016https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2016
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines.BMJ. 2016; 353https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2016
- Executive summary: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2020; 142: S2-S27https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000890
- Executive summary: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. 2020; 156: A1-A22
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 467-473https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
- COSCA (Core Outcome Set for Cardiac Arrest) in Adults: An Advisory Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2018; 127: 147-163https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.022
- KSU and expert systematic reviewer team process document.2018 (Accessed August 11, 2020)
- Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: A systematic review.Resuscitation. 2018; 131: 91-100https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.07.029
- ILCOR Task Force Systematic Reviews (TFSR) of interventions: step by step guide.2019 (Accessed May 11, 2020)
- Early or First Aid Administration Versus Late or In-hospital Administration of Aspirin for Non-traumatic Adult Chest Pain: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2020; 12: e6862https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6862
- GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT.J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 81: 101-110https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.009
- 4: Advanced life support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Science and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2020; 142: S92-S139https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000893
- on behalf of the Adult Advanced Life Support Collaborators. Adult advanced life support: International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitation. 2020; 156: A79-A118
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). ILCOR task force ADOLOPMENT of existing publication: step by step guide. https://www.ilcor.org/data/Task_Force_Adolopment_Instructions_v_2_2Nov2019SACapproved.docx. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14: 579https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
- PICOST template.2019 (Accessed August 11, 2020)
- Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients.BMJ. 2015; 350: h870https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h870
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies.BMJ. 2008; 336: 1106-1110https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE
- PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration.Ann Intern Med. 2019; 170: W1-W33https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-1377
- GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions.J Clin Epidemiol. 2020; 119: 126-135https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.10.014
- RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.BMJ. 2019; 366: l4898https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 401-406https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
- GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence.J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 111: 105-114https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.BMJ. 2016; 355: i4919https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919
Evidence Prime Inc. GDT Guideline Development Tool. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/help/user_guide/index.html. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence.J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 87: 4-13https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.006
- GRADE Guidelines: 19. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-Risk of bias and indirectness.J Clin Epidemiol. 2019; 111: 94-104https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.013
- GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66: 719-725https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.013
- World Health Organization strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence (study quality) are frequent and often inconsistent with GRADE guidance.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 72: 98-106https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.10.011
- Guideline groups should make recommendations even if the evidence is considered insufficient.CMAJ. 2020; 192: E23-E24https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.190144
- Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 80: 3-7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.07.006
- Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005; 8: 19-32
- Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67: 1291-1294https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). ILCOR Task Force Scoping Reviews (TFScR): step by step guide. https://www.ilcor.org/data/Task_Force_Scoping_Reviews_Guidance_v_1.0_27_Sept_2019SACApproved.docx. Accessed August 11, 2020.
- Scoping review template v1.0 SAC approved.2019 (https://www.ilcor.org/data/Scoping_Review_Template_SAC_Approved_17Nov2019.docx. Accessed August 11, 2020)
- Chest compression components (rate, depth, chest wall recoil and leaning): A scoping review.Resuscitation. 2020; 146: 188-202https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.042
- Part 4: conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2010 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.Circulation. 2010; 122: S291-S297https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970962
- International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; American Heart Association. Part 4: conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2010 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Resuscitatio. 2010; 81 (PMID: 20956036): e41-e47https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.024
- The formula for survival in resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2013; 84: 1487-1493https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.07.020
Article info
Publication history
Published online: October 21, 2020
Footnotes
☆This article has been co-published in Circulation.
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.
