If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Medical Academy named after S.I. Georgievsky of V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, 295051, Lenin Blvd, 5/7, Simferopol, Russian Federation
Risk of disease transmission is well known to be a factor limiting willingness of laypeople to attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Current COVID-19 pandemic intensify concerns regarding a potential decrease in readiness of lay public to provide help as a result of the fear of being infected
To investigate impact of the pandemic on laypeople's attitudes toward the performance of bystander CPR, the levels of willingness before and after the COVID-19 outbreak start were compared. Voluntary participants of the Russian-speaking massive open online course (MOOC) in basic life support (BLS) and automated external defibrillation (AED)
rated their readiness to attempt CPR on a stranger using the 5-point Likert scale both pre- and post-training. The one-month data collected for April 2020 were compared with the data for April 2019.
In April 2020, a total of 5062 individuals joined the course (vs. 833 in April 2019). Of them, 43% (n = 2171) completed the course curriculum (vs. 19%, n = 157). After completing the course, a substantial increase (p < 0.001) in the average level of readiness to attempt resuscitation (from 3.5 to 4.3 points) and in the proportion of trainees who expressed high levels of willingness to provide CPR (4–5 points; from 54% to 84%) were recorded. The motivating effect of the training was also confirmed for April 2019: self-assessed willingness and the proportion of trainees with high willingness increased from 3.2 to 4.1 points and from 42% to 79%, respectively (p < 0.001). Further, in April 2020, the percentage of trainees expressing high baseline willingness to help was significantly higher than in April 2019 (p < 0.001).
In summary, the comparison suggests the pandemic did not cause any decrease in the baseline or post-training levels of willingness to provide CPR in trainees of the MOOC. However, one should account that the audience of the course does not represent general population, and the voluntary participants of the MOOC may have higher personal motivation to help.
There was a six-fold higher course enrollment rate and fourteen-fold higher course completion rate in April 2020 compared to April 2019. Substantial growth in the number of course participants started from March 17, 2020 (Fig. 1). Supposedly, the increment was triggered by the recommendation of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation to switch higher education to distance learning approach from March 16, 2020. An increase in the course enrollment and completion rates was also observed for the English-language version of the MOOC
In response to the current COVID-19 pandemic, the European Resuscitation Council recommended to withhold face-to-face BLS training for laypeople, and emphasized the relevance of distance learning to minimize the risk of infection transmission
Being widely available and free of charge, MOOCs offer an opportunity to increase accessibility of resuscitation training, to inform the community on the recommended precautions in relation to the infection risk to rescuers