Advertisement
Review| Volume 143, P196-207, October 2019

Download started.

Ok

Novel technologies for heart rate assessment during neonatal resuscitation at birth – A systematic review

  • Peter A. Johnson
    Affiliations
    Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Po-Yin Cheung
    Affiliations
    Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Tze-Fun Lee
    Affiliations
    Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Megan O’Reilly
    Affiliations
    Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Search for articles by this author
  • Georg M. Schmölzer
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Avenue NW, T5H 3V9 Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
    Affiliations
    Centre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Neonatal Research Unit, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      6.5–9 million newborns worldwide require resuscitation at birth annually. During neonatal resuscitation, inaccurate or slow heart rate (HR) assessments may significantly increase risk of infant mortality or morbidity. Therefore fast, accurate, and effective HR assessment tools are critical for neonatal resuscitation.

      Objective

      To systematically review the literature about accuracy, latency, and efficacy of technologies for HR assessment during neonatal resuscitation.

      Methods

      Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched to identify studies related to technologies for HR assessment, which could be used to guide neonatal resuscitation.

      Results

      Forty-six studies evaluating HR assessment technologies for neonatal resuscitation were identified. In total, 16 studies (3/16 randomized trials and 13/16 observational studies) compared two or more HR assessment technologies to measure accuracy, latency, and efficacy. Of the trials, 1/3 had a low risk of bias while 2/3 had high risks. All observational studies had high risks of bias. Most studies considered infants not requiring resuscitation, constituting indirect evidence and lower certainty in the context of neonatal resuscitation. Two trials reported faster times to HR assessment using electrocardiogram with a mean(SD) 66(20) versus 114(39) s and a median(IQR) 24(19–39) versus 48(36–69) s (both p < 0.001), compared to pulse oximetry.

      Conclusion

      While electrocardiography is faster to assess HR at birth and more reliable to detect HR changes compared to other recommended technologies, practice should not exclusively rely on ECG. While novel technologies could support HR assessment, no studies validate their clinical efficacy during neonatal resuscitation.

      Abbreviations:

      NRP (Neonatal Resuscitation Program), HR (heart rate), PO (pulse oximetry), ECG (electrocardiography), PEA (pulseless electric activity), bpm (beats per minute), CI (confidence interval), SD (standard deviation), IQR (interquartile range), DS (digital stethoscope), PPG (photoplethsymography), PZT (piezoelectric transducer)

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Resuscitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Perlman J.
        • Wyllie J.
        • Kattwinkel J.
        • et al.
        Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: S204-S241https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000276
        • Wyckoff M.
        • Aziz K.
        • Escobedo M.
        • et al.
        Part 13: Neonatal resuscitation 2015 american heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2015; https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3373G
        • Wyllie J.
        • Bruinenberg J.
        • Roehr C.C.
        • Rüdiger M.
        • Trevisanuto D.
        • Urlesberger B.
        European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 249-263https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.029
        • Weiner G.M.
        • Zaichkin J.
        • Kattwinkel J.
        • American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association
        Textbook of neonatal resuscitation.
        American Academy of Pediatrics, 2016
        • Weiner G.M.
        • Zaichkin J.
        • Kattwinkel J.
        • Ades A.
        Weiner G.M. Zaichkin J. Kattwinkel J. Ades A. Textbook of neonatal resuscitation. 7th ed. Elk Grove Village, 2016
        • Perlman J.M.
        • Wyllie J.
        • Kattwinkel J.
        • et al.
        Neonatal resuscitation: 2010 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: S516-S538https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2972B
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        • O’donnell C.P.F.
        • Everest N.J.
        • Davis P.G.
        • Morley C.J.
        Accuracy of clinical assessment of infant heart rate in the delivery room.
        Resuscitation. 2006; 71: 319-321https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.015
        • Van Vonderen J.J.
        • Hooper S.B.
        • Kroese J.K.
        • et al.
        Pulse oximetry measures a lower heart rate at birth compared with electrocardiography.
        J Pediatr. 2015; 166: 49-53https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.09.015
        • O’Donnell C.P.F.
        • Omar C.
        • Kamlin F.
        • Davis P.G.
        • Morley C.J.
        Feasibility of and delay in obtaining pulse oximetry during neonatal resuscitation.
        J Pediatr. 2005; 147: 698-699https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.07.025
        • Swenson A.K.
        • Brown D.
        • Stevermer J.J.
        Pulse oximetry for newborns: should it be routine?.
        J Fam Pract. 2012; 61: 283-286
        • Myerburg R.J.
        • Halperin H.
        • Egan D.A.
        • et al.
        Pulseless electric activity.
        Circulation. 2013; 128: 2532-2541https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004490
        • Sillers L.
        • Handley S.C.
        • James J.R.
        • Foglia E.E.
        Pulseless electrical activity complicating neonatal resuscitation established facts.
        2018https://doi.org/10.1159/000493357
        • Mehta C.
        • Brady W.
        Pulseless electrical activity in cardiac arrest: electrocardiographic presentations and management considerations based on the electrocardiogram.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2012; 30: 236-239https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJEM.2010.08.017
        • Patel S.
        • Cheung P.-Y.
        • Solevåg A.L.
        • et al.
        Pulseless electrical activity: a misdiagnosed entity during asphyxia in newborn infants?.
        Arch Dis Child – Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; (fetalneonatal-2018-314907)https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-314907
        • Luong D.H.
        • Cheung P.-Y.
        • O’Reilly M.
        • Lee T.-F.
        • Schmolzer G.M.
        Electrocardiography vs auscultation to assess heart rate during cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity in newborn infants.
        Front Pediatr. 2018; 6: 1-4https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00366
        • Luong D.
        • Cheung P.
        • Barrington K.
        • et al.
        Cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity rhythm in newborn infants – a case series [accepted].
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019;
        • Piastra M.
        • Cavallaro F.
        • Genovese O.
        • et al.
        Double cooling for pericardial tamponade and cardiac arrest after rewarming in neonatal asphyxia.
        Resuscitation. 2013; 84: e83-e84https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.03.020
        • Hyde P.
        • Puddy V.
        Pulseless electrical activity after rapid administration of fresh frozen plasma.
        J Paediatr Child Health. 2008; 44: 464-466https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2008.01345.x
        • Kevat A.C.
        • Bullen D.V.R.
        • Davis P.G.
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        A systematic review of novel technology for monitoring infant and newborn heart rate.
        Acta Paediatr. 2017; 106: 710-720https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13786
        • Swarup S.
        • Makaryus A.N.
        Digital stethoscope: technology update.
        Med Devices (Auckl). 2018; 11: 29-36https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S135882
        • Balogh Á.T.
        • Kovács F.
        Application of phonocardiography on preterm infants with patent ductus arteriosus.
        Biomed Signal Process Control. 2011; 6: 337-345https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2011.05.009
        • Kevat A.
        • Dawson J.
        • Davis P.
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        Evaluation of a digital stethoscope and smart device technology for assessment of heart rate in the newborn infant.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015; 100: F562-F563https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-308639
        • Gaertner V.D.
        • Kevat A.C.
        • Davis P.G.
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        Evaluation of a digital stethoscope in transitioning term infants after birth.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017; 102: F370-F371https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-312316
        • Treston B.
        • Semberova J.
        • Kernan R.
        Assessment of neonatal heart rate immediately after birth using digital stethoscope, handheld ultrasound and electrocardiography: an observational cohort study.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal. 2018; : F1
        • Binotti M.
        • Cavallin F.
        • Ingrassia P.L.
        • et al.
        Heart rate assessment using NeoTapAdvancedSupport: a simulation study.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; : 1-3https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315408
        • Höök S.M.
        • Pejovic N.J.
        • Tylleskär T.
        • Alfvén T.
        Evaluation of a smartphone based application for neonatal heart rate assessment: a simulation study.
        Svenska Barnläkarföreningen Barnveckan. 2015
        • Dawson J.A.
        • Omar Kamlin C.F.
        • Vento M.
        • et al.
        Defining the reference range for oxygen saturation for infants after birth.
        Pediatrics. 2010; 125: 1340-1347https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-1510
        • Schmölzer G.M.
        • Kamlin O.F.O.C.
        • Dawson J.A.
        • te Pas A.B.
        • Morley C.J.
        • Davis P.G.
        Respiratory monitoring of neonatal resuscitation.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010; 95: 295-303https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.165878
      1. Jahan E, Barua T, Salma U. An Overview on Heart Rate Monitoring and Pulse Oximeter System. Vol. 3.

        • Kopotic R.J.
        • Lindner W.
        Assessing high-risk infants in the delivery room with pulse oximetry.
        Anesth Analg. 2002; 94: S31-S36
        • Workie F.A.
        • Rais-Bahrami K.
        • Short B.L.
        Clinical use of new-generation pulse oximeters in the neonatal intensive care unit.
        Am J Perinatol. 2005; 22: 357-360https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-872704
        • Dawson J.A.
        • Morley C.J.
        Monitoring oxygen saturation and heart rate in the early neonatal period.
        Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15: 203-207https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SINY.2010.03.004
        • Masimo Corporation
        Radical signal extraction pulse oximeter operator's manual.
        2006 (1.1-8.2)
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        • Dawson J.A.
        • O’Donnell C.P.F.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of pulse oximetry measurement of heart rate of newborn infants in the delivery room.
        J Pediatr. 2008; 152: 756-760https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.01.002
        • Toth B.
        • Becker A.
        • Seelbach-Göbel B.
        Oxygen saturation in healthy newborn infants immediately after birth measured by pulse oximetry.
        Arch Gynecol Obs. 2002; 266: 105-107
        • Dawson J.A.
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        • Wong C.
        • et al.
        Oxygen saturation and heart rate during delivery room resuscitation of infants.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009; 94: F87-F91https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.141341
        • Dawson J.A.
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        • Wong C.
        • et al.
        Changes in heart rate in the first minutes after birth.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010; 95: F177-F181https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.169102
        • Di Fiore J.M.
        Neonatal cardiorespiratory monitoring techniques.
        Semin Neonatol. 2004; 9: 195-203https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2003.11.009
        • Hutchon D.J.R.
        Technological developments in neonatal care at birth.
        J Nurs Care. 2013; 03: 1-3https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-1168.1000218
        • Richig J.W.
        • Sleeper M.M.
        • Richig J.W.
        • Sleeper M.M.
        Principles of electrocardiography.
        Electrocardiogr Lab Anim. 2014; : 9-17https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-415936-5.00002-5
        • Murphy M.C.
        • De Angelis L.
        • Mccarthy L.K.
        • Patrick C.
        • O’donnell F.
        • Finbarr O’donnell P.
        Randomised study comparing heart rate measurement in newly born infants using a monitor incorporating electrocardiogram and pulse oximeter versus pulse oximeter alone.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; : 1-4https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314366
        • Murphy M.C.
        • De Angelis L.
        • McCarthy L.K.
        • O’Donnell C.P.F.
        Comparison of infant heart rate assessment by auscultation, ECG and oximetry in the delivery room.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; 103: F490-F492https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-314367
        • Katheria A.
        • Arnell K.
        • Brown M.
        • et al.
        A pilot randomized controlled trial of EKG for neonatal resuscitation.
        PLOS ONE. 2017; 12: e0187730https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187730
        • Mizumoto H.
        • Tomotaki S.
        • Shibata H.
        • et al.
        Electrocardiogram shows reliable heart rates much earlier than pulse oximetry during neonatal resuscitation.
        Pediatr Int. 2012; 54: 205-207https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-200X.2011.03506.x
        • Katheria A.
        • Rich W.
        • Finer N.
        Electrocardiogram provides a continuous heart rate faster than oximetry during neonatal resuscitation.
        2012https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0784
        • Iglesias B.
        • Rodrí Guez J.
        • Aleo E.
        • et al.
        3-lead electrocardiogram is more reliable than pulse oximetry to detect bradycardia during stabilisation at birth of very preterm infants.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017; : 1-5https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311492
        • Yam C.H.
        • Dawson J.A.
        • Schmölzer G.M.
        • Morley C.J.
        • Davis P.G.
        Heart rate changes during resuscitation of newly born infants.
        Arch Dis Child – Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96: F102-F107https://doi.org/10.1136/ADC.2009.180950
        • Chen W.
        • Bouwstra S.
        • Oetomo S.B.
        • Feijs L.
        Intelligent design for neonatal monitoring with wearable sensors.
        in: Somerset V.S. Intelligent and biosensors. Intech, Vukovar2010: 1-24
        • Linde J.E.
        • Schulz J.
        • Perlman J.M.
        • et al.
        Normal newborn heart rate in the first five minutes of life assessed by dry-electrode electrocardiography.
        Neonatology. 2016; 110: 231-237https://doi.org/10.1159/000445930
        • Hodgson K.A.
        • Kamlin C.O.F.
        • Rogerson S.
        • Thio M.
        ECG monitoring in the delivery room is not reliable for all patients.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018; 103: F88https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2017-313928
        • Chong S.W.
        • Peyton P.J.
        A meta-analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM).
        Anaesthesia. 2012; 67: 1266-1271https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07311.x
        • Lemke R.P.
        • Farrah M.
        • Byrne P.
        Use of a new doppler umbilical cord clamp to measure heart rate in newborn infants in the delivery room.
        EJ Neonatol Res. 2011; 1: 83-88
        • Dyson A.
        • Jeffrey M.
        • Kluckow M.
        Measurement of neonatal heart rate using handheld Doppler ultrasound.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017; 102: F116-F119https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-310669
        • Goenka S.
        • Khan M.
        • Koppel R.I.
        • Heiman H.S.
        Precordial doppler ultrasound achieves earlier and more accurate newborn heart rates in the delivery room.
        Am Acad Pediatr Natl Conf Exhib. 2013;
        • Moraes J.L.
        • Rocha M.X.
        • Vasconcelos G.G.
        • Vasconcelos Filho J.E.
        • de Albuquerque V.H.C.
        • Alexandria A.R.
        Advances in photopletysmography signal analysis for biomedical applications.
        Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061894
        • Johansson A.
        • Oberg P.A.
        • Sedin G.
        Monitoring of heart and respiratory rates in newborn infants using a new photoplethysmographic technique.
        J Clin Monit Comput. 1999; 15: 461-467
        • Olsson E.
        • Ugnell H.
        • Oberg P.A.
        • Sedin G.
        Photoplethysmography for simultaneous recording of heart and respiratory rates in newborn infants.
        Acta Paediatr. 2000; 89: 853-861
        • Grubb M.
        • Carpenter J.
        • Crowe J.A.
        • et al.
        Forehead reflectance photoplethysmography to monitor heart rate: preliminary results from neonatal patients.
        Physiol Meas. 2014; 35: 881-893https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/35/5/881
        • Lin Y.-C.
        • Wei K.-C.
        An electronic smart watch monitors heart rate of an extremely preterm baby.
        Pediatr Neonatol. 2018; 59: 214-215https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2017.07.010
        • Afsar F.S.
        Skin care for preterm and term neonates.
        Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009; 34: 855-858https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03424.x
        • Aarts L.A.M.
        • Jeanne V.
        • Cleary J.P.
        • et al.
        Non-contact heart rate monitoring utilizing camera photoplethysmography in the neonatal intensive care unit — a pilot study.
        Early Hum Dev. 2013; 89: 943-948https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.09.016
        • Chaichulee S.
        • Villarroel M.
        • Jorge J.
        • et al.
        Localised photoplethysmography imaging for heart rate estimation of pre-term infants in the clinic.
        in: Optical diagnostics and sensing XVIII: toward point-of-care diagnostics. vol. 10501. SPIE, 2018: 26https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2289759
        • Stickney R.E.
        • Jayne C.P.
        • Lank P.
        • et al.
        Apparatus, software, and methods for cardiac pulse detection using a piezoelectric sensor [patent].
        2004
        • Wang F.
        • Tanaka M.
        • Chonan S.
        Development of a PVDF piezopolymer sensor for unconstrained in-sleep cardiorespiratory monitoring.
        J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 2003; 14: 185-190https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X03014003006
        • Wang F.
        • Zou Y.
        • Tanaka M.
        • Matsuda T.
        • Chonan S.
        Unconstrained cardiorespiratory monitor for premature infants.
        Int J Appl Electromagn Mech. 2007; 25 (IOS Press): 469-475
        • Sato S.
        • Ishida-Nakajima W.
        • Ishida A.
        • et al.
        Assessment of a new piezoelectric transducer sensor for noninvasive cardiorespiratory monitoring of newborn infants in the NICU.
        Neonatology. 2010; 98: 179-190https://doi.org/10.1159/000283994
        • Nukaya S.
        • Sugie M.
        • Kurihara Y.
        • Hiroyasu T.
        • Watanabe K.
        • Tanaka H.
        A noninvasive heartbeat, respiration, and body movement monitoring system for neonates.
        Artif Life Robot. 2014; 19: 414-419https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-014-0179-4
        • Kato T.
        • Ueno A.
        • Kataoka S.
        • Hoshino H.
        • Ishiyama Y.
        An application of capacitive electrode for detecting electrocardiogram of neonates and infants.
        in: 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE2006: 916-919https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260362
        • Atallah L.
        • Serteyn A.
        • Meftah M.
        • et al.
        Unobtrusive ECG monitoring in the NICU using a capacitive sensing array.
        Physiol Meas. 2014; 35: 895-913https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/35/5/895

      Linked Article