Advertisement
Experimental paper| Volume 127, P119-124, June 2018

End-tidal CO2-guided automated robot CPR system in the pig. Preliminary communication

  • Gil Joon Suh
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author at: Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea

    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jaeheung Park
    Affiliations
    Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University and the Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, 145 Gwanggyo-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jung Chan Lee
    Affiliations
    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University Hospital and the Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, Medical Research Center, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sang Hoon Na
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea

    Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Woon Yong Kwon
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea

    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kyung Su Kim
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Taegyun Kim
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yoon Sun Jung
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jung-In Ko
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • So Mi Shin
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kyoung Min You
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, 20 Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 07061, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      Our aim was to compare the efficacy of the end-tidal CO2-guided automated robot CPR (robot CPR) system with manual CPR and mechanical device CPR.

      Methods

      We developed the algorithm of the robot CPR system which automatically finds the optimal compression position under the guidance of end-tidal CO2 feedback in swine models of cardiac arrest. Then, 18 pigs after 11 min of cardiac arrest were randomly assigned to one of three groups, robot CPR, LUCAS CPR, and manual CPR groups (n = 6 each group). Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and Neurological Deficit Score 48 h after ROSC were compared.

      Results

      A ROSC was achieved in 5 pigs, 4 pigs, and 3 pigs in the robot CPR, LUCAS CPR, and manual CPR groups, respectively (p = 0.47). Robot CPR showed a significant difference in Neurological Deficit Score 48 h after ROSC compared to manual CPR, whereas LUCAS CPR showed no significant difference over manual CPR. (p = 0.01; Robot versus Manual adjusted p = 0.04, Robot versus LUCAS adjusted p = 0.07, Manual versus LUCAS adjusted p = 1.00).

      Conclusions

      The end-tidal CO2-guided automated robot CPR system did not significantly improve ROSC rate in a swine model of cardiac arrest. However, robot CPR showed significant improvement of Neurological Deficit Score 48 h after ROSC compared to Manual CPR while LUCAS CPR showed no significant improvement compared to Manual CPR.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Resuscitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Andersen L.W.
        • Bivens M.J.
        • Giberson T.
        • Giberson B.
        • Mottley J.L.
        • Gautam S.
        • et al.
        The relationship between age and outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 94: 49-54
        • Bolling S.F.
        The introduction of closed chest cardiac massage.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 1990; 49: 154-156
        • Kleinman M.E.
        • Brennan E.E.
        • Goldberger Z.D.
        • Swor R.A.
        • Terry M.
        • Bobrow B.J.
        • et al.
        Part 5: adult basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: 2015 american heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: S414-35
        • Krep H.
        • Mamier M.
        • Breil M.
        • Heister U.
        • Fischer M.
        • Hoeft A.
        Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the AutoPulse system: a prospective observational study with a new load-distributing band chest compression device.
        Resuscitation. 2007; 73: 86-95
        • Steen S.
        • Sjoberg T.
        • Olsson P.
        • Young M.
        Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.
        Resuscitation. 2005; 67: 25-30
        • Brooks S.C.
        • Anderson M.L.
        • Bruder E.
        • Daya M.R.
        • Gaffney A.
        • Otto C.W.
        • et al.
        Part 6: alternative techniques and ancillary devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: S436-43
        • Cave D.M.
        • Gazmuri R.J.
        • Otto C.W.
        • Nadkarni V.M.
        • Cheng A.
        • Brooks S.C.
        • et al.
        Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: S720-8
        • Rubertsson S.
        • Lindgren E.
        • Smekal D.
        • Ostlund O.
        • Silfverstolpe J.
        • Lichtveld R.A.
        • et al.
        Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 53-61
        • Weil M.H.
        • Bisera J.
        • Trevino R.P.
        • Rackow E.C.
        Cardiac output and end-tidal carbon dioxide.
        Crit Care Med. 1985; 13: 907-909
        • Falk J.L.
        • Rackow E.C.
        • Weil M.H.
        End-tidal carbon dioxide concentration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 607-611
        • Gudipati C.V.
        • Weil M.H.
        • Bisera J.
        • Deshmukh H.G.
        • Rackow E.C.
        Expired carbon dioxide: a noninvasive monitor of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        Circulation. 1988; 77: 234-239
        • Sanders A.B.
        • Ewy G.A.
        • Bragg S.
        • Atlas M.
        • Kern K.B.
        Expired PCO2 as a prognostic indicator of successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1985; 14: 948-952
        • Trevino R.P.
        • Bisera J.
        • Weil M.H.
        • Rackow E.C.
        • Grundler W.G.
        End-tidal CO2 as a guide to successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a preliminary report.
        Crit Care Med. 1985; 13: 910-911
        • Sheak K.R.
        • Wiebe D.J.
        • Leary M.
        • Babaeizadeh S.
        • Yuen T.C.
        • Zive D.
        • et al.
        Quantitative relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide and CPR quality during both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 89: 149-154
        • Soar J.
        • Nolan J.P.
        • Bottiger B.W.
        • Perkins G.D.
        • Lott C.
        • Carli P.
        • et al.
        European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 3. Adult advanced life support.
        Resuscitation. 2015; 95: 100-147
        • Jung J.
        • Kim J.
        • Kim S.
        • Kwon W.Y.
        • Na S.H.
        • Kim K.S.
        • et al.
        Application of robot manipulator for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        in: Cham: Springer2016 International Symposium on Experimental Robotics. ISER 2016. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics. vol. 1. 2017: 266-274
        • Suh G.J.
        • Kwon W.Y.
        • Kim K.S.
        • Lee H.J.
        • Jeong K.Y.
        • Jung Y.S.
        • et al.
        Prolonged therapeutic hypothermia is more effective in attenuating brain apoptosis in a Swine cardiac arrest model.
        Crit Care Med. 2014; 42: e132-42
        • Idris A.H.
        • Becker L.B.
        • Ornato J.P.
        • Hedges J.R.
        • Bircher N.G.
        • Chandra N.C.
        • et al.
        Utstein-style guidelines for uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research A statement for healthcare professionals from a Task Force of the American Heart Association, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American College of Cardiology, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Institute of Critical Care Medicine, the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
        Resuscitation. 1996; 33: 69-84
        • Wenzel V.
        • Lindner K.H.
        • Krismer A.C.
        • Voelckel W.G.
        • Schocke M.F.
        • Hund W.
        • et al.
        Survival with full neurologic recovery and no cerebral pathology after prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation with vasopressin in pigs.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 527-533
        • Idris A.H.
        • Staples E.D.
        • O'Brien D.J.
        • Melker R.J.
        • Rush W.J.
        • Del Duca K.D.
        • et al.
        End-tidal carbon dioxide during extremely low cardiac output.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1994; 23: 568-572