The combination of the LUCAS 2 (L-CPR) automated CPR device and an impedance threshold device (ITD) has been widely implemented in the clinical field. This animal study tested the hypothesis that the addition of an ITD on L-CPR would enhance cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures.
Ten female pigs (39.0 ± 2.0 kg) were sedated, intubated, anesthetized with isofluorane, and paralyzed with succinylcholine (93.3 μg/kg/min) to inhibit the potential confounding effect of gasping. After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, 4 min of L-CPR + an active ITD or L-CPR + a sham ITD was initiated and followed by another 4 min of the alternative method of CPR. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), diastolic right atrial pressure (RAP), intracranial pressure (ICP), airway pressure, and end tidal CO2 (ETCO2) were recorded continuously. Data expressed as mean mmHg ± SD.
Decompression phase airway pressure was significantly lower with L-CPR + active ITD versus L-CPR + sham ITD (−5.3 ± 2.2 vs. −0.5 ± 0.6; p < 0.001). L-CPR + active ITD treatment resulted in significantly improved hemodynamics versus L-CPR + sham ITD: ETCO2, 35 ± 6 vs. 29 ± 7 (p = 0.015); SBP, 99 ± 9 vs. 93 ± 15 (p = 0.050); DBP, 24 ± 12 vs. 19 ± 15 (p = 0.006); coronary perfusion pressure, 29 ± 8 vs. 26 ± 7 (p = 0.004) and cerebral perfusion pressure, 24 ± 13 vs. 21 ± 12 (p = 0.028).
In pigs undergoing L-CPR the addition of the active ITD significantly reduced intrathoracic pressure and increased vital organ perfusion pressures.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Resuscitation
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association.Circulation. 2013; 128: 417-435
- Active compression–decompression. A new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group.J Am Med Assoc. 1992; 267: 2916-2923
- Regional blood flow during closed-chest cardiac resuscitation in rats.J Appl Physiol. 1993; 74: 147-152
- Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2002; 55: 285-299
- Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS: a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2005; 65: 357-363
- Mechanical active compression–decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) versus manual CPR according to pressure of end tidal carbon dioxide (P(ET)CO2) during CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Resuscitation. 2009; 80: 1099-1103
- Improving active compression–decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance valve.Circulation. 1995; 91: 1629-1632
- Use of an inspiratory impedance valve improves neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of ventricular fibrillation.Circulation. 2002; 105: 124-129
- Comparison of a 10-breaths-per-minute versus a 2-breaths-per-minute strategy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.Respir Care. 2008; 53: 862-870
- Optimizing standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve.Chest. 1998; 113: 1084-1090
- Improving standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.Anesth Analg. 2001; 93: 649-655
- Effect of an inspiratory impedance threshold device on hemodynamics during conventional manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Resuscitation. 2005; 66: 13-20
- What is the role of chest compression depth during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.Crit Care Med. 2012; 40: 1192-1198
- Chest compression rates during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are suboptimal: a prospective study during in-hospital cardiac arrest.Circulation. 2005; 111: 428-434
- The interaction of chest compression rates with the impedance threshold device and association with survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – abstract late breaking clinical trial.Circulation. 2012; 126: 2776-2799
Published online: September 25, 2014
Accepted: September 8, 2014
Received in revised form: August 23, 2014
Received: July 7, 2014
☆A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.013.
© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.