This study explored individual, team, and setting factors associated with the quality of management of in-hospital emergency situations experienced by former Advanced Life Support (ALS) course participants.
This study was a survey of former ALS course participants’ long-term experience of management of in-hospital, emergency situations. The survey was carried out in 2012 in Denmark and Norway.
A questionnaire was send to 526 potential responders and (281/479 × 100) 58.7% responded. The results demonstrated that 75% of the emergency situations were perceived as “managed well”. In general, the responders’ confidence in being ALS providers was high, mean 4.3 (SD 0.8), scale 1–5. Significant differences between the perceived “well” and “not well” managed situations were found for all questions, p < 0.001. The largest differences related to perception of co-workers’ ability to apply ALS principles, the team atmosphere and communication. Responders’ ratings of quality of management of emergency situations increased with intensity of setting. However, the ‘clinical setting’ was rated significantly lower as attributor to ability to apply ALS principles compared to ‘co-workers familiarity with ALS principles’, ‘own confidence as ALS-provider’ and ‘own social/inter-personal skills’.
The results of this survey emphasise that ALS providers’ perceived ability to apply ALS skills were substantially affected by teamwork skills and co-workers’ skills. Team related factors associated with successful outcome were related to clear role distribution, clear inter-personal communication and attentive listening, as well as respectful behaviour and positive team atmosphere. Although intensity of setting was attributed to ability to apply ALS principles, this did not affect management of emergency situations to the same extent as individual and team factors.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Resuscitation
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Ways of interprofessional collaboration and learning in emergency work.Stud Contin Educ. 2011; (iFirst article): 1-20
- Leading to recovery: group performance and coordinative activities in medical emergency driven groups.Hum Perform. 2006; 19: 277-304
- Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams.J Manage stud. 2003; 40: 1419-1452
- Long-term intended and unintended experiences after Advanced Life Support training.Resuscitation. 2013; 84: 273-377
- Communities of practice: learning as a social system.Syst Thinker. 1998; : 9
- Teamwork and leadership in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 57: 2381-2388
- Do team processes really have an effect on clinical performance?. A systematic literature review.Br J Anaesth. 2013; 110: 529-544
Hofstede G. The Hofstede Centre. 〈geert-hofstede.com〉.
- European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010. Section 1. Executive summary.Resuscitation. 2010; : 1-233
- Gehlbach: AM last page: survey development guidance for medical education researchers.Acad Med. 2010; 85: 925
- Target-focused medical emergency team training using a human patient simulator: effects on behaviour and attitude.Med Educ. 2007; 41: 173-180
- Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Routledge Academic, 2013
- Statistical power analysis.Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992;
- Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare education: a synthesis of the outcome from an Utstein style meeting.Simul Healthcare. 2011; 6: 155-167
- Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning.J Educ Psychol. 1993; 28: 117-148
- Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resusciation teams.Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 703-711
- Competence, respect and trust: key features of successful interprofessional nurse–doctor relationships.J Interprof Care. 2008; 22: 133-147
- Speaking up and sharing information improves trainee neonatal resuscitations.J Patient Saf. 2012; 8: 202-209
- Identifying non-technical skills and barriers for improvement of teamwork in cardiac arrest teams.Resuscitation. 2010; 81: 695-702
- Effects of team coordination during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review of the literature.J Crit Care. 2013; 28: 504-521
- Hodges B.D. Lingard L. The question of competence: reconsidering medical education in the twenty-first century. Cornell University Press, 2012
- Evidence for the validity of grouped self-assessments in measuring the outcomes of educational programs.Eval Health Prof. 2013;
- Conflicting messages: examining the dynamics of leadership on interprofessional teams.Acad Med. 2012; 87: 1762-1767
Published online: August 20, 2014
Accepted: August 5, 2014
Received in revised form: July 6, 2014
Received: March 6, 2014
☆A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.08.004.
© 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.