Advertisement
Clinical paper| Volume 75, ISSUE 2, P305-310, November 2007

Is the inter-nipple line the correct hand position for effective chest compression in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

  • Author Footnotes
    a Current address: Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    Jungho Shin
    Footnotes
    a Current address: Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joong Eui Rhee
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 31 787 7570; fax: +82 31 787 4027.
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kyuseok Kim
    Affiliations
    Department of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    a Current address: Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

      Summary

      Background

      Despite the new release of CPR guidelines, there was insufficient evidence for or against a specific hand position for manual chest compression in adults. Computed tomography (CT) images of the chest can demonstrate objectively the spatial relationship between the surface landmarks on the chest and the inner viscera underneath them. This study is designed to examine the spatial relationship between the inter-nipple line (INL) and the heart in order to determine the proper hand position for more effective CPR.

      Methods

      We enrolled 189 adult patients who underwent low dose chest CT from 16 October to 10 November 2006. Patients’ demographic data were collected. The sternal length, the distance from the xiphoid to the INL, and the distance from the xiphoid to the maximal heart diameter were measured by using 3D reconstructed CT images.

      Results

      In about 80% of the 189 patients’ CT images, the intrathoracic structure just underneath the INL was the ascending aorta (18.0%), the root of aorta (48.7%), or the left ventricular outflow tract (12.7%), rather than the left ventricle itself (20.6%). The INL was 6.2 ± 1.8 cm and 5.6 ± 1.9 cm cephalad to the xiphoid for the male and the female, respectively. The coronal CT image plane of the maximal heart diameter was 2.8 ± 1.6 cm and 2.3 ± 1.6 cm cephalad to the xiphoid for the male and the female, respectively.

      Conclusion

      For more efficient and effective chest compression during CPR, compressing the sternum more caudally than the INL could be considered if it is not associated with the risk of increasing internal visceral injuries.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Resuscitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cooper J.A.
        • Cooper J.D.
        • Cooper J.M.
        Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: history, current practice, and future direction.
        Circulation. 2006; 114: 2839-2849
        • Kouwenhoven W.B.
        • Jude J.R.
        • Knickerbocker G.G.
        Closed-chest cardiac massage.
        JAMA. 1960; 173: 1064-1067
        • Thaler M.M.
        • Stobie G.H.C.
        An improved technique of external cardiac compression in infants and young children.
        N Engl J Med. 1963; 269: 606-610
        • Orlowski J.P.
        Optimum position for external cardiac compression in infants and young children.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1986; 15: 667-673
      1. 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 2. Adult Basic Life Support. Circulation 2005; 112[Suppl I]: III-5–16.

      2. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators. Resuscitation 2005; 67: s7–23.

      3. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Part 4. Adult Basic Life Support. Circulation 2005; 112[Suppl I]: IV-19–34.

      4. Basic Life Support for Healthcare Providers Student Manual. American Heart Association; 2006.

        • Maier G.W.
        • Tyson G.S.
        • Olsen C.O.
        • et al.
        The physiology of external cardiac massage: high-impulse cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        Circulation. 1984; 70: 86-101
        • Pickard A.
        • Darby M.
        • Soar J.
        Radiological assessment of the adult chest: implications for chest compressions.
        Resuscutation. 2006; 71: 387-390
        • Robert S.H.
        • Douglas C.
        Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
        Resuscitation. 2004; 63: 327-338
        • Kundra P.
        • Dey S.
        • Ravishankar M.
        Role of dominant hand position during external cardiac compression.
        Br J Anaesth. 2000; 84: 491-493
        • Baubin M.
        • Kollmitzet J.
        • Pomaroli A.
        • et al.
        Force distribution across the heel of the hand during simulated manual chest compression.
        Resuscitation. 1997; 35: 259-263