Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 44, ISSUE 2, P105-108, April 2000

Airway pressure with chest compressions versus Heimlich manoeuvre in recently dead adults with complete airway obstruction

  • A. Langhelle
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +47-23016819; fax: +47-23016799
    Affiliations
    Norwegian Air Ambulance, Department of Research and Education in Acute Medicine, N-1441 Droebak, Norway

    Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Ullevaal University Hospital N-04047 Oslo, Norway
    Search for articles by this author
  • K. Sunde
    Affiliations
    Norwegian Air Ambulance, Department of Research and Education in Acute Medicine, N-1441 Droebak, Norway

    Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Ullevaal University Hospital N-04047 Oslo, Norway
    Search for articles by this author
  • L. Wik
    Affiliations
    Medinnova SF, National Hospital of Norway, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
    Search for articles by this author
  • P.A. Steen
    Affiliations
    Departments of Anaesthesiology and Emergency Medical Services, Ullevaal University Hospital, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      In a previous case report a standard chest compression successfully removed a foreign body from the airway after the Heimlich manoeuvre had failed. Based on this case, standard chest compressions and Heimlich manoeuvres were performed by emergency physicians on 12 unselected cadavers with a simulated complete airway obstruction in a randomised crossover design. The mean peak airway pressure was significantly lower with abdominal thrusts compared to chest compressions, 26.4±19.8 cmH2O versus 40.8±16.4 cmH2O, respectively (P=0.005, 95% confidence interval for the mean difference 5.3–23.4 cmH2O). Standard chest compressions therefore have the potential of being more effective than the Heimlich manoeuvre for the management of complete airway obstruction by a foreign body in an unconscious patient. Removal of the Heimlich manoeuvre from the resuscitation algorithm for unconscious patients with suspected airway obstruction will also simplify training.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Resuscitation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Statistisk sentralbyrå. Causes of Death 1995. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå, 1998.

      2. Accident Facts. 1984 Edition. National Safety Council, Chicago, 1984.

        • Handley A.J.
        • Bahr J.
        • Baskett P.
        • Bossaert L.
        • Chamberlain D.
        • Dick W.
        • Ekstrom L.
        • Juchems R.
        • Kettler D.
        • Marsden A.
        • et al.
        The European Resuscitation Council guidelines for adult single rescuer basic life support: a statement from the Working Group on Basic Life Support, and approved by the executive committee (see comments).
        Resuscitation. 1998; 37 (published erratum appears in Resuscitation 1998 Aug; 38 (2): 131–2): 67-80
        • American Heart Association
        Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care.
        J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1992; 268: 2191-2194
        • Day R.L.
        • Crelin E.S.
        • DuBois A.B.
        Choking: the Heimlich abdominal thrust vs back blows: an approach to measurement of inertial and aerodynamic forces.
        Pediatrics. 1982; 70: 113-119
        • Heimlich H.J.
        A life-saving maneuver to prevent food-choking.
        J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1975; 234: 398-401
        • Skulberg A.
        Chest compression — an alternative to the Heimlich manoeuvre? (letter).
        Resuscitation. 1992; 24: 91
        • Gordon A.S.
        • Belton M.K.
        • Ridolpho P.F.
        • Safar P.
        • Elam J.
        Emergency management of foreign body airway obstruction.
        in: Advances in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Springer, New York1977: 39-50
      3. Guildner CW, Williams D, Subitch T. Airway obstructed by foreign material: the Heimlich manoeuvre, JACEP 1976;5:675–7.

        • Ruben H.
        • Macnaughton F.I.
        The treatment of food-choking.
        Practitioner. 1978; 221: 725-729
        • Heimlich H.J.
        • Patrick E.A.
        The Heimlich maneuver: best technique for saving any choking victim's life (see comments).
        Postgrad. Med. 1990; 87, 53: 38-43
        • Weaver F.J.
        • Ramirez A.G.
        • Dorfman S.B.
        • Raizner A.E.
        Trainees’ retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: how quickly they forgot.
        J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1970; 241: 901-903
        • Bjorshol C.A.
        Cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills: a survey among health and rescue personnel outside hospital (in Norwegian).
        Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 1996; 116: 508-511
        • Kaye W.
        • Mancini M.E.
        Retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills by physicians, registered nurses, and the general public.
        Crit. Care Med. 1986; 14: 620-622
        • Eisenburger P.
        • Safar P.
        Life supporting first aid training of the public — review and recommendations.
        Resuscitation. 1999; 41: 3-18