Resuscitation
Volume 82, Supplement 2 , Pages S52-S55, December 2011

Delayed high-quality CPR does not improve outcomes

  • Fengqing Song

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Shijie Sun

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
    • The Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Giuseppe Ristagno

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Tao Yu

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Yi Shan

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Sung Phil Chung

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Max Harry Weil

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
    • The Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • ,
  • Wanchun Tang

      Affiliations

    • Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Rancho Mirage, CA, USA
    • The Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress for correspondence: Wanchun Tang, MD, Weil Institute of Critical Care Medicine, 35100 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA, 92270, USA. Tel.: +1-760-778-4911; fax: +1 760-778-3468

Abstract 

Aim of study

The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an important factor in the outcome of cardiac arrest. Our objective was to compare outcomes following either immediate low-quality (LQ) CPR or delayed high-quality (HQ) CPR. We hypothesized that delayed HQ CPR will improve the outcomes of CPR in comparison to immediately performing LQ CPR.

Methods

Eighteen Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into two groups: (1) Delayed HQ CPR (HQ group, n = 9). (2) Immediate LQ CPR (LQ group, n = 9). Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced and untreated for 8 mins. CPR was immediately performed in LQ group for 5 mins. Compression depth was set at 70% of the “optimal compression depth”. VF was untreated for an additional 5 mins in HQ group. HQ CPR was started together with ventilation (100% oxygen) and external hypothermia for 8 mins in both groups. The “optimal compression depth” was approximately 30% of the anteroposterior chest diameter. Epinephrine was administrated 3 mins prior to defibrillation attempt. Restoration of spontaneous circulation, postresuscitation myocardial function and survival time were monitored.

Results

All animals in the LQ group and 7 of 9 animals in the HQ group were resuscitated. Myocardial function, including ejection fraction and cardiac output was better in the LQ group than in the HQ group (p < 0.05) and survival time was longer in the LQ group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The outcomes after immediate LQ CPR, were better than those after delayed HQ CPR in this rat model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.

Key words:  Cardiac arrest , Cardiopulmonary resuscitation , Quality

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0300-9572(11)70152-6

doi:10.1016/S0300-9572(11)70152-6

Resuscitation
Volume 82, Supplement 2 , Pages S52-S55, December 2011