Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 11 , Pages 1488-1491, November 2010

Bystander CPR in south east Scotland increases over 16 years

  • R. Ghose

      Affiliations

    • University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • R.M. Lyon

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 0131 242 1338; fax: +44 0131 242 1339.
  • ,
  • G.R. Clegg

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • A.J. Gray

      Affiliations

    • Emergency Department, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • on behalf of the Emergency Medicine Research Group Edinburgh

Received 27 April 2010; received in revised form 27 May 2010; accepted 14 June 2010. published online 26 July 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains a leading cause of mortality and serious neurological disability across Europe. Without immediate bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), chances of survival are minimal. Despite community initiatives to increase the number of trained CPR providers, the effectiveness of these measures remains unknown and the proportion of OHCA patients receiving bystander CPR in the United Kingdom yet to be established. We sought to identify the change in the rate of bystander CPR in south east Scotland over a 16-year period.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of all adult non-traumatic OHCA in south east Scotland from 1 January 1992 to 31 December 2007 using the Heartstart Scotland database.

Results

7928 OHCA were included. The proportion of patients receiving bystander CPR increased from 34% in 1992 to 52% in 2007 (p for trend <0.0001). The rate of CPR from bystanders, spouses and from relatives increased significantly over the study period. Patients arresting at home received significantly less bystander CPR than those arresting away from home (39% vs 52%, p<0.0001) regardless of age or sex.

Conclusion

There has been a significant increase in bystander CPR in south east Scotland during the 16-year period. Bystander CPR is associated with an increased rate of survival and targeted CPR training for relatives of patients at risk of sudden cardiac death may be beneficial.

Keywords: Emergency department, Resuscitation, Cardiac care, Cardiac arrest

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.06.012.

PII: S0300-9572(10)00359-X

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.06.012

Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 11 , Pages 1488-1491, November 2010