Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 8 , Pages 932-937, August 2010

ViEWS—Towards a national early warning score for detecting adult inpatient deterioration

  • David R. Prytherch

      Affiliations

    • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Gary B. Smith

      Affiliations

    • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
    • University of Bournemouth, United Kingdom
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Critical Care, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, United Kingdom. Tel.: +44 23 92286306; fax: +44 23 92286326.
  • ,
  • Paul E. Schmidt

      Affiliations

    • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
    • University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
  • ,
  • Peter I. Featherstone

      Affiliations

    • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
    • University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom

Received 25 January 2010; received in revised form 12 April 2010; accepted 15 April 2010.

Abstract 

Aim of study

To develop a validated, paper-based, aggregate weighted track and trigger system (AWTTS) that could serve as a template for a national early warning score (EWS) for the detection of patient deterioration.

Materials and methods

Using existing knowledge of the relationship between physiological data and adverse clinical outcomes, a thorough review of the literature surrounding EWS and physiology, and a previous detailed analysis of published EWSs, we developed a new paper-based EWS – VitalPAC™ EWS (ViEWS). We applied ViEWS to a large vital signs database (n=198,755 observation sets) collected from 35,585 consecutive, completed acute medical admissions, and also evaluated the comparative performance of 33 other AWTTSs, for a range of outcomes using the area under the receiver-operating characteristics (AUROC) curve.

Results

The AUROC (95% CI) for ViEWS using in-hospital mortality with 24h of the observation set was 0.888 (0.880–0.895). The AUROCs (95% CI) for the 33 other AWTTSs tested using the same outcome ranged from 0.803 (0.792–0.815) to 0.850 (0.841–0.859). ViEWS performed better than the 33 other AWTTSs for all outcomes tested.

Conclusions

We have developed a simple AWTTS – ViEWS – designed for paper-based application and demonstrated that its performance for predicting mortality (within a range of timescales) is superior to all other published AWTTSs that we tested. We have also developed a tool to provide a relative measure of the number of “triggers” that would be generated at different values of EWS and permits the comparison of the workload generated by different AWTTSs.

Keywords: Monitoring, Outcome, Vital signs, Cardiac arrest, Patient safety, Risk

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.014.

PII: S0300-9572(10)00242-X

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.014

Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 8 , Pages 932-937, August 2010