Incidence of re-arrest and critical events during prolonged transport of post-cardiac arrest patients☆☆☆★
Abstract
Aim
To determine the feasibility of transporting post-cardiac arrest patients to tertiary-care facilities, the rate of re-arrest, and the rate of critical events during critical care transport team (CCTT) care.
Methods
Retrospective chart review of cardiac arrest patients transported via CCTT between 1/1/2001 and 5/31/2009. Demographic information, re-arrest, and critical events during transport were abstracted. We defined critical events as hypotension (systolic blood pressure
<
90mm
Hg), hypoxia (oxygen saturation
<
90%), or both hypotension and hypoxia at any time during CCTT care. Comparisons were performed using Chi-squared test and a Cox proportional hazards model was employed to determine predictors of events.
Results
Of the 248 patients studied, the majority was male (61%), presented in ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT, 50%), and comatose (80%). Re-arrest was uncommon (N
=
15; 6%). Critical events affected 58 patients (23%) during transport. Median transport time was 63
min (IQR 51, 81) in both those who experienced a critical event and those who did not. Vasopressor use was associated with any decompensation during CCTT (Hazard Ratio 1.81; 95%CI 1.29, 2.54). Three patients (20%) suffering re-arrest survived to hospital discharge. Survival (Chi square 11.77; p
<
0.01) and good neurologic outcome (Chi square 5.93; p
=
0.01) were higher in patients who did not suffer any event during transport.
Conclusions
Transport of resuscitated cardiac arrest patients to a tertiary-care facility via CCTT is feasible, and the duration of transport is not associated with re-arrest during transport. Repeat cardiac arrest occurs infrequently, while critical events are more common. Outcomes are worse in those experiencing an event.
Keywords: Cardiac arrest, EMS, Helicopter, Hypothermia, Resuscitation
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.012.
☆☆ Presented at the American Heart Association Resuscitation Science Symposium, November 14, 2009 in Orlando, Florida.
★ Presented at the National Association of EMS Physicians Meeting, January 2010 in Phoenix, AZ.
PII: S0300-9572(10)00239-X
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.012
© 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

