Logo
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 8, Pages 938-942 (August 2010)


View previous. 4 of 34 View next.

Incidence of re-arrest and critical events during prolonged transport of post-cardiac arrest patients☆☆

A. Hartkea, B.E. Mummaa, J.C. RittenbergerbCorresponding Author Informationemail addressemail address, C.W. Callawayb, F.X. Guyetteb

Received 19 November 2009; received in revised form 30 March 2010; accepted 13 April 2010. published online 20 May 2010.

Abstract 

Aim

To determine the feasibility of transporting post-cardiac arrest patients to tertiary-care facilities, the rate of re-arrest, and the rate of critical events during critical care transport team (CCTT) care.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of cardiac arrest patients transported via CCTT between 1/1/2001 and 5/31/2009. Demographic information, re-arrest, and critical events during transport were abstracted. We defined critical events as hypotension (systolic blood pressure<90mmHg), hypoxia (oxygen saturation<90%), or both hypotension and hypoxia at any time during CCTT care. Comparisons were performed using Chi-squared test and a Cox proportional hazards model was employed to determine predictors of events.

Results

Of the 248 patients studied, the majority was male (61%), presented in ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT, 50%), and comatose (80%). Re-arrest was uncommon (N=15; 6%). Critical events affected 58 patients (23%) during transport. Median transport time was 63min (IQR 51, 81) in both those who experienced a critical event and those who did not. Vasopressor use was associated with any decompensation during CCTT (Hazard Ratio 1.81; 95%CI 1.29, 2.54). Three patients (20%) suffering re-arrest survived to hospital discharge. Survival (Chi square 11.77; p<0.01) and good neurologic outcome (Chi square 5.93; p=0.01) were higher in patients who did not suffer any event during transport.

Conclusions

Transport of resuscitated cardiac arrest patients to a tertiary-care facility via CCTT is feasible, and the duration of transport is not associated with re-arrest during transport. Repeat cardiac arrest occurs infrequently, while critical events are more common. Outcomes are worse in those experiencing an event.

a University of Pittsburgh, Affiliated Residency in Emergency Medicine, United States

b University of Pittsburgh, Department of Emergency Medicine, United States

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: University of Pittsburgh, Department of Emergency Medicine, Iroquois Building, Suite 400A, 3600 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States. Tel.: +1 412 647 9489; fax: +1 412 647 6999.

 A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.012.

☆☆ Presented at the American Heart Association Resuscitation Science Symposium, November 14, 2009 in Orlando, Florida.

 Presented at the National Association of EMS Physicians Meeting, January 2010 in Phoenix, AZ.

PII: S0300-9572(10)00239-X

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.012


View previous. 4 of 34 View next.