Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 5 , Pages 579-584, May 2010

Rescuer fatigue and cardiopulmonary resuscitation positions: A randomized controlled crossover trial

  • Ning-Ping Foo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Jer-Hao Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • Hung-Jung Lin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
  • ,
  • How-Ran Guo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Sustainable Environment Research Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 138 Sheng-Li Road, Tainan 70428, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 6 2353535x5802; fax: +886 6 2752484.

Received 18 August 2009; received in revised form 2 February 2010; accepted 5 February 2010. published online 11 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

During cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), it is recommended to alternate rescuers every 2min when two or more rescuers are available, regardless of the rescuer's position. It is unclear, however, whether rescuer fatigue depends on the rescuer's position.

Purpose

To compare rescuer fatigue by doing CPR in different positions.

Methods

This randomized controlled crossover trial studied 24 experienced health-care providers from a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. Each participant performed CPR for 10min on days 1, 8, and 15 of the study in three different positions: kneeling, standing on a taboret, and standing on the floor. Effective compression was recorded using the Laerdal Resusci-Anne Skillreporter manikin. The range of motion (ROM) of the elbows and lower back were detected using a flexible goniometer, and the severity of back pain was scored using the Brief Pain Inventory short-form.

Results

Rescuers maintained adequate effective compressions for 2min while kneeling and standing on a taboret, but only for 1min while standing on the floor. The ROM for elbows and lower back during CPR while kneeling were significantly lower than for standing on the floor. Moreover, the total pain (p<0.001) and social interference (p=0.004) scores 24h after CPR were significantly lower for the kneeling position.

Conclusions

CPR is best performed in a kneeling position. In order to minimize rescuer fatigue, we recommend alternating rescuers every 2min while kneeling or standing on a taboret, and every 1min while standing on the floor.

Keywords: Rescuer fatigue, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Position, Back pain, Flexible goniometer, Range of motion

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.006.

PII: S0300-9572(10)00087-0

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.006

Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 5 , Pages 579-584, May 2010