The relationship between time to arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) and survival from out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest☆
Received 26 August 2009; received in revised form 26 January 2010; accepted 8 February 2010. published online 08 March 2010.
Abstract
Aim
We examined the relationship between time from collapse to arrival of emergency medical services (EMS) and survival to hospital discharge for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrests in order to determine meaningful interpretations of this association.
Methods
We calculated survival rates in 1-min intervals from collapse to EMS arrival. Additionally, we used logistic regression to determine the absolute probability of survival per minute of delayed EMS arrival. We created a logistic regression model with spline terms for the time variable to examine the decline in survival in intervals that are hypothesized to be physiologically relevant.
Results
The observed data showed survival declined, on average, by 3% for each minute that EMS was delayed following collapse. Survival rates did not decline appreciably if the time between collapse and arrival of EMS was 4min or less but they declined by 5.2% per minute between 5 and 10min. EMS arrival 11–15min after collapse showed a less steep decline in survival of 1.9% per minute. The spline model that incorporated changes in slope in the time interval variable modeled this relationship more accurately than a model with a continuous term for time (p=0.01).
Conclusions
The results of our analyses show that survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest does not decline at a constant rate following collapse. Models that incorporate changes that reflect the physiological alterations that occur following cardiac arrests are a more accurate way to describe changes in survival rates over time than models that include only a continuous term for time.