Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 5 , Pages 530-533 , May 2010

Two simple questions to assess neurologic outcomes at 3 months after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Experience from the Public Access Defibrillation Trial

  • W.T. Longstreth Jr.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
    • Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
    • Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Neurology, Box 359775, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-2420, United States. Tel.: +1 206 744 3251; fax: +1 206 744 8787.
  • ,
  • Graham Nichol

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
    • Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
  • ,
  • Lois Van Ottingham

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
  • ,
  • Alfred P. Hallstrom

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States

Received 3 September 2009 ,Revised 13 January 2010 ,Accepted 18 January 2010.

References 

  1. Lindley RI, Waddell F, Livingstone M, et al. Can simple questions assess outcome after stroke?. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1994;4:314–324
  2. Kay R, Wong KS, Yu YL, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1588–1593
  3. The International Stroke Trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both, or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 1997;349:1569–81.
  4. Berge E, Abdelnoor M, Nakstad PH, Sandset PM. Low molecular-weight heparin versus aspirin in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: a double-blind randomised study. HAEST Study Group. Heparin in Acute Embolic Stroke Trial. Lancet. 2000;355:1205–1210
  5. Berge E, Fjaertoft H, Indredavik B, Sandset PM. Validity and reliability of simple questions in assessing short- and long-term outcome in Norwegian stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11:305–310
  6. McKevitt C, Dundas R, Wolfe C. Two simple questions to assess outcome after stroke: a European study. Stroke. 2001;32:681–686
  7. Celani MG, Cantisani TA, Righetti E, Spizzichino L, Ricci S. Different measures for assessing stroke outcome: an analysis from the International Stroke Trial in Italy. Stroke. 2002;33:218–223
  8. Ornato JP, McBurnie MA, Nichol G, et al. The Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) Trial: study design and rationale. Resuscitation. 2003;56:135–147
  9. Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, Weisfeldt M, et al. Public-access defibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:637–646
  10. A randomized clinical trial of calcium entry blocker administration to comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Design, methods, and patient characteristics. The Brain Resuscitation Clinical Trial II Study Group. Control Clin Trials 1991;12:525–45.
  11. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;1:480–484
  12. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483
  13. Roccaforte WH, Burke WJ, Bayer BL, Wengel SP. Validation of a telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:697–702
  14. Nichol G, Stiell IG, Hebert P, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Laupacis A. What is the quality of life for survivors of cardiac arrest? A prospective study. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6:95–102
  15. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54
  16. Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Nichol G, et al. Comparison of the Cerebral Performance Category score and the Health Utilities Index for survivors of cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53:241–248
  17. Longstreth WT, Dikmen SS. Outcomes after cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 1993;22:64–69
  18. Dennis M, Wellwood I, O’Rourke S, MacHale S, Warlow C. How reliable are simple questions in assessing outcome after stroke?. Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;7:19–21
  19. Dorman P, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Are the modified “simple questions” a valid and reliable measure of health related quality of life after stroke? United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000;69:487–493
  20. Chong JY, Lee HS, Boden-Albala B, Paik MC, Sacco RL. Gender differences in self-report of recovery after stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study. Neurology. 2006;67:1282–1284

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.011.

PII: S0300-9572(10)00053-5

doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.01.011

Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 5 , Pages 530-533 , May 2010