Logo
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 457-462 (April 2010)


View previous. 17 of 28 View next.

Performance of an automated external defibrillator in a moving ambulance vehicle

Jong Geun Yunaemail address, Kyung Woon JeungbCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Byung Kook Leebemail address, Hyun Ho Ryubemail address, Hyoung Youn Leecemail address, Mu Jin Kimbemail address, Tag Heobemail address, Yong Il Minbemail address, YeonHo Youdemail address

Received 11 September 2009; received in revised form 16 December 2009; accepted 23 December 2009. published online 01 February 2010.

Abstract 

Aim of the study

The available data suggest that automated external defibrillators (AED) can be safely used in vibration-like moving conditions such as rigid inflatable boats and aircraft environments. However, little literature exists examining their performance in a moving ambulance. The present study was undertaken to determine whether an AED is able to analyse the heart rhythm correctly during ambulance transport.

Methods

An ambulance was driven on paved (20–100km/h) and unpaved (10km/h) roads. The performance of two AED devices (CU ER 2, CU Medical Systems Inc., Korea, and Heartstart MRx, Phillips, USA) was determined in a moving ambulance using manikins. Vibration intensity was measured simultaneously with a digital vibrometer. AED performance was then evaluated again on manikins and on a swine model under simulated vibration intensities (0.5–5m/s2) measured by the vibrometer in the previous phase of the investigation.

Results

The vibration intensity increased with increasing speeds on paved roads (1.98±0.44m/s2 at 100km/h). While driving on unpaved roads, it increased to 6.40±1.06m/s2. Both AED algorithms analysed the heart rhythm correctly under resting state. When tested on pigs, both algorithms showed substantially degraded performances, even at low vibration intensities of 0.5–1m/s2, which corresponded to vibration intensities while driving on paved roads at 20–60km/h. This study also showed that electrocardiograms generated on manikins were more resistant to motion artifacts than were the pig electrocardiograms.

Conclusion

Ambulance personnel should consider the possibility of misinterpretation by an AED when this device is used while transporting a patient.

a Department of Emergency Medical Technician, Dongkang College, 160 Dongmunro, Bukgu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

b Department of Emergency Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, 671 Jebongno, Donggu, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

c Department of Field Medicine, School of Military Medicine, 78-501 Chumokdong, Yuseonggu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

d Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, 640 Daesadong, Junggu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +82 62 220 6809; fax: +82 62 228 7417.

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.031.

PII: S0300-9572(10)00018-3

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.031


View previous. 17 of 28 View next.