Logo
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 388-392 (April 2010)


View previous. 5 of 28 View next.

Rapid induction of therapeutic hypothermia using convective-immersion surface cooling: Safety, efficacy and outcomes

Daniel HowesaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, William Ohleyb, Paul Dorianc, Cathy Klockd, Robert Freedmane, Robert Schocke, Danica Krizanacf, Michael Holzerg

Received 6 November 2009; received in revised form 18 December 2009; accepted 26 December 2009. published online 01 February 2010.

Abstract 

Therapeutic hypothermia has become an accepted part of post-resuscitation care. Efforts to shorten the time from return of spontaneous circulation to target temperature have led to the exploration of different cooling techniques. Convective-immersion uses a continuous shower of 2°C water to rapidly induce hypothermia. The primary purpose of this multi-center trial was to evaluate the feasibility and speed of convective-immersion cooling in the clinical environment. The secondary goal was to examine the impact of rapid hypothermia induction on patient outcome.

24 post-cardiac arrest patients from 3 centers were enrolled in the study; 22 agreed to participate until the 6-month evaluations were completed. The median rate of cooling was 3.0°C/h. Cooling times were shorter than reported in previous studies. The median time to cool the patients to target temperature (<34°C) was 37min (range 14–81min); and only 27min in a subset of patients sedated with propofol. Survival was excellent, with 68% surviving to 6 months; 87% of survivors were living independently at 6 months.

Conductive-immersion surface cooling using the ThermoSuit® System is a rapid, effective method of inducing therapeutic hypothermia. Although the study was not designed to demonstrate impact on outcomes, survival and neurologic function were superior to those previously reported, suggesting comparative studies should be undertaken. Shortening the delay from return of spontaneous circulation to hypothermic target temperature may significantly improve survival and neurologic outcome and warrants further study.

a Emergency Medicine Critical Care, Queen's University, 20-202 Richardson House, KGH, 102 Stuart St., Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3V7

b Department of Electrical, Computer & Biomedical Engineering, University of Rhode Island, United States

c Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada

d Department of Electrical Engineering, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, United States

e Life Recovery Systems HD, LLC, 150 Hopper Avenue, Waldwick, NJ 07463, United States

f Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20/6D, 1090 Vienna, Austria

g Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Austria

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 613 453 5593; fax: +1 613 548 1331.

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.025.

PII: S0300-9572(10)00012-2

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.025


View previous. 5 of 28 View next.