Logo
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 440-445 (April 2010)


View previous. 14 of 28 View next.

The importance of pre-trauma centre treatment of life-threatening events on the mortality of patients transferred with severe trauma

Ernestina GomesaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Rui Araújoa, António Carneiroa, Cláudia Diasb, Altamiro Costa-Pereirac, Fiona E. Leckyd

Received 24 May 2009; received in revised form 15 December 2009; accepted 20 December 2009. published online 18 January 2010.

Abstract 

Aim

The benefit of a well organised trauma system is acknowledged but doubts remain concerning the optimal pre-hospital trauma care model. We hypothesise that the treatment of life-threatening events before arrival at trauma centre – either pre-hospital or first hospital – may be more relevant to decreasing mortality than shortening the time to trauma centre.

Methods

A cohort of 727 trauma patients with life-threatening events – identified as airway, breathing, circulation or neurological disability – requiring transfer to a trauma centre were studied. Data on patient's characteristics, trauma features, and mortality were taken from a trauma registry. Patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the place of treatment of life-threatening events: pre-hospital, first hospital or trauma centre. Survival Kaplan–Meier curves and logistic regression were used to assess the effect of place of treatment of life-threatening events on mortality.

Results

Patients from the pre-hospital and first hospital groups had 20% and 27% mortality respectively, compared to 38% among those whose life-threatening events were corrected only at the trauma centre. Logistic regression showed that patients whose life-threatening events were corrected only at the trauma centre had an odds of death 3.3 times greater than those from the pre-hospital group, adjusted for patient and trauma characteristics and time to trauma centre.

Conclusion

In trauma patients requiring transfer to a trauma centre, pre-hospital interventions to treat life-threatening events may significantly decrease mortality when compared to similar interventions performed later at the trauma centre.

a Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Hospital de Santo António, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal

b Serviço de Bioestatística e Informática Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

c CINTESIS (Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias da Saúde e Sistemas de Informação em Saúde), Serviço de Bioestatística e Informática Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Alameda Professor Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

d Trauma Audit and Research Network, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Hope Hospital, Salford M6 8HD, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +351 917616900; fax: +351 222009483.

 A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.014.

PII: S0300-9572(09)00668-6

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.014


View previous. 14 of 28 View next.