Logo
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 327-330 (March 2010)


View previous. 13 of 25 View next.

Delivery room resuscitation of near-term infants: Role of the laryngeal mask airway

Vincenzo ZanardoaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Gary Weinerc, Massimo Micagliob, Nicoletta Doglionia, Ramona Buzzaccheroa, Daniele Trevisanutoa

Received 2 February 2009; received in revised form 11 November 2009; accepted 12 November 2009. published online 21 December 2009.

Abstract 

Aim

This observational study aims to describe: (1) the use of positive pressure ventilation (PPV) for resuscitation in the delivery room among newly born near-term infants; (2) the methods used for PPV resuscitation [e.g., bag–facial mask (BFM), laryngeal mask airway (LMA), endotracheal tube (ETT)]; and (3) the association of each device with short-term neonatal outcomes.

Methods

We identified near-term (34 0/7–36 6/7 weeks) infants delivered at the Padua University Hospital (Padua, Italy) during the years 2002–2006. The mode of delivery, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, methods of resuscitation and respiratory outcome after NICU admission were analysed.

Results

During the 5-year study period, 921 (4.9%) near-term infants were identified from a total of 18,641 live births. PPV was provided in the delivery room to 86 (9.3%) of these infants. Among them, 36 (41.8%) were managed by LMA, 34 (39.5%) by BFM and 16 (18.6%) by ETT. Thirty-four (39.5%) resuscitated near-term infants were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU): 15 (44.1%) after BFM, 12 (75%) after ETT and seven (19.4%) after LMA. Resuscitation with an ETT was associated with an increased rate of respiratory distress syndrome when compared with either BFM or LMA. Resuscitation with an LMA was associated with a lower rate of NICU admission and shorter length of stay when compared with either BFM or ETT.

Conclusion

The LMA is an effective device for primary airway management of near-term infants and for secondary airway management among near-term infants failing BFM or ETT resuscitation.

a Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, Padua University, Padua, Italy

b Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Medicine, Padua University, Padua, Italy

c Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Wayne State University School of Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Paediatrics, Padua University, Via Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padua, Italy. Tel.: +39 049 8213571; fax: +39 049 8213509.

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.005.

PII: S0300-9572(09)00583-8

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.005


View previous. 13 of 25 View next.