Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 1 , Pages 47-52, January 2010

Nifekalant versus lidocaine for in-hospital shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia

  • Tsuyoshi Shiga

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +81 3 3353 8111; fax: +81 3 3356 0441.
  • ,
  • Keiji Tanaka

      Affiliations

    • Intensive and Cardiac Care Unit, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Rinya Kato

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Nagoya Ekisaikai Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
  • ,
  • Mari Amino

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
  • ,
  • Yuji Matsudo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Kimitsu Chuo Hospital, Kisarazu, Japan
  • ,
  • Toshihiro Honda

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Saisei-kai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
  • ,
  • Koichi Sagara

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, The Cardiovascular Institute, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Atsushi Takahashi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan
  • ,
  • Takao Katoh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Mitsuyoshi Urashima

      Affiliations

    • Division of Molecular Epidemiology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Satoshi Ogawa

      Affiliations

    • International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Teruo Takano

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Kasanuki

      Affiliations

    • Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • for the Refractory VT/VF, Prospective Evaluation to Differentiate Lidocaine Efficacy from Nifekalant (RELIEF) Study Investigators

Received 6 June 2009; received in revised form 15 August 2009; accepted 20 September 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Abstract 

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of nifekalant, a pure class III anti-arrhythmic drug, and lidocaine in patients with shock-resistant in-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT).

Patients and methods

Between August 2005 and March 2008, we conducted a prospective, two-arm, cluster observational study, in which participating hospitals were pre-registered either to the nifekalant arm or the lidocaine arm. Patients were enrolled if they had in-hospital VF or VT resistant to at least two defibrillation shocks. Congenital or drug-induced long QT syndrome was excluded. The primary end-point was termination of VF or VT with/without additional shock. The secondary end-points were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 1-month survival and survival to hospital discharge. We also assessed the frequency of adverse events, including asystole, pulseless electrical activity and torsade de pointes.

Results

In total, 55 patients were enrolled. After nifekalant, 22 of 27 patients showed termination of VF or VT, as compared with 15 of 28 patients treated with lidocaine with/without additional shock (odds ratio (OR): 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1–13.0; P=0.03). Twenty-three of 27 patients given nifekalant showed ROSC, as compared with 15 of 28 patients given lidocaine (OR: 5.0; 95% CI: 1.4–18.2; P=0.01). There was no difference in 1-month survival or survival to hospital discharge between the nifekalant and lidocaine arms. There was a higher incidence of asystole with lidocaine (7 of 28 patients) than with nifekalant (0 of 27 patients) (P=0.005). Torsade de pointes was not observed.

Conclusion

Nifekalant was more effective than lidocaine for termination of arrhythmia and for ROSC in patients with shock-resistant in-hospital VF or VT (umin-CTR No. UMIN 000001781).

Keywords: Anti-arrhythmic drug, Defibrillation, Ventricular fibrillation, Nifekalant, Lidocaine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.027.

PII: S0300-9572(09)00503-6

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.027

Resuscitation
Volume 81, Issue 1 , Pages 47-52, January 2010