Logo
Search for

Volume 80, Issue 11, Pages 1264-1269 (November 2009)


View previous. 11 of 28 View next.

Abnormal vital signs are associated with an increased risk for critical events in US veteran inpatients

Geoffrey K. LighthallabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Sharmin Markarb, Robert Hsiunga

Received 20 April 2009; received in revised form 21 June 2009; accepted 9 August 2009. published online 10 September 2009.

Abstract 

Aim

Establish the frequency of abnormal vital signs in medical and surgical ward patients; study their association with “critical events,” which for the purposes of this study, were mortality, cardiac arrests and unplanned ICU transfers.

Design and methods

Four-month prospective, observational cohort study; University-affiliated US Veteran's hospital. Vital signs from all regular ward medical and surgical inpatients were recorded over the study period and compared with records of cardiac arrests, mortality and ICU admissions.

Results

Using the Hospital's Medical Emergency Team criteria to define normal/abnormal thresholds for vital signs, abnormal vital signs (VSMET) were found in 16% of patients; of these; 35% experienced a critical event vs. 2.5% in the patients with normal vital signs (OR 21, 95% CI 12–35, p<0.001). The sensitivity of VSMET to predict a critical event was 0.72 and the positive predictive value was 0.35; sensitivity decreased to 0.28 and positive predictive value increased to 0.78 for patients that had two different VSMET. Survival was significantly lower in both medical and surgical patients with VSMET at both 30 days and at 1 year following discharge (p<0.02). Both medical and surgical patients with VSMET had twice the length of stay of patients with normal vitals (3 vs. 7 days; p<0.001).

Conclusions

Even single recordings of VSMET signaled increased risk for critical events in hospital ward patients. Use of vital signs as criteria for additional patient assessment and possible ICU admission appears justified. Development of abnormal vitals during hospitalization may signify impaired physiologic reserve that places a patient at higher risk for mortality after discharge.

a Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States

b Department of Anesthesiology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Anesthesia, MC 112A, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States. Tel.: +650 493 5000x66756; fax: +650 852 3432.

 A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.012.

PII: S0300-9572(09)00428-6

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.012


View previous. 11 of 28 View next.