Quantitative analysis of chest compression interruptions during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents☆
Abstract
Aim
To quantitatively describe pauses in chest compression (CC) delivery during resuscitation from in-hospital pediatric and adolescent cardiac arrest. We hypothesized that CPR error will be more likely after a chest compression provider change compared to other causes for pauses.
Methods
CPR recording/feedback defibrillators were used to evaluate CPR quality for victims ≥8 years who received CPR in the PICU/ED. Audiovisual feedback was supplied in accordance with AHA targets. Etiology of CC pauses identified by post-event debriefing/reviews of stored CPR quality data.
Results
Analysis yielded 205 pauses during 304.8
min of CPR from 20 consecutive cardiac arrests. Etiologies were: 57.1% for provider switch; 23.9% for pulse/rhythm analysis; 4.4% for defibrillation; and 14.6% “other.” Provider switch accounted for 41.2% of no-flow duration. Compared to other causes, CPR epochs following pauses due to provider switch were more likely to have measurable residual leaning (OR: 5.52; CI95: 2.94, 10.32; p
<
0.001) and were shallower (43
±
8 vs. 46
±
7
mm; mean difference: −2.42
mm; CI95: −4.71, −0.13; p
=
0.04). Individuals performing continuous CPR
≥
120
s as compared to those switching earlier performed deeper chest compressions (42
±
6 vs. 38
±
7
mm; mean difference: 4.44
mm; CI95: 2.39, 6.49; p
<
0.001) and were more compliant with guideline depth recommendations (OR: 5.11; CI95: 1.67, 15.66; p
=
0.004).
Conclusions
Provider switches account for a significant portion of no-flow time. Measurable residual leaning is more likely after provider switch. Feedback systems may allow some providers to continue high quality CPR past the recommended switch time of 2
min during in-hospital resuscitation attempts.
Abbreviations: AHA, American Heart Association, CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CC, chest compression
Keywords: Pediatric, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Quality appraisal
To access this article, please choose from the options below
☆ A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.009.
PII: S0300-9572(09)00422-5
doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.009
© 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

