Logo
Search for

Volume 80, Issue 10, Pages 1187-1191 (October 2009)


View previous. 20 of 26 View next.

Expert clinical assessment of thorax stiffness of infants and children during chest compressions

Kristy B. ArbogastaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Akira Nishisakibd, Sriram Balasubramaniana, Jon Nysaetherc1, Dana Nilesd, Robert M. Suttonb, Kathryn E. Robertse, Lauren Nadkarnia, John Bouletf, Matthew R. Maltesea, Vinay M. Nadkarnibd

Received 8 April 2009; received in revised form 2 June 2009; accepted 15 July 2009. published online 21 August 2009.

Abstract 

Background

High-fidelity manikins have been shown to be useful in teaching appropriate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) techniques. Similarity of manikin chest compression characteristics to real children is desirable. Little data exists on thorax stiffness in infants and children to guide manikin construction.

Objective

To determine a ‘consensus clinical-expert assessment’ of the pediatric chest stiffness for two specific age groups—infants and 5-year-olds.

Methods

Four manikins in each of two sizes (5-year child, 6-month infant) were identically constructed, except for thorax downstroke spring stiffness. Health care providers with pediatric CPR experience provided chest compressions to each manikin in random order, masked to thoracic stiffness. Each health care provider was instructed to identify the manikin with downstroke thoracic stiffness most similar to children on whom they have performed chest compressions. Duplicate assessment of a randomly selected, previously assessed manikin was performed to assess health care provider consistency using the kappa statistic. Subject inter-rater agreement on which manikin best approximated a child of that age was assessed by calculating the percentage of subjects who identified that manikin as the best approximation of an actual child.

Results

A convenience sample of 63 international experts was obtained: 52 from Critical Care, 3 from Emergency Medicine, 4 from Pediatrics, and 4 from other specialties. There were 6 and 8 experts whose assessments were inconsistent for the infant manikins and child manikins, respectively. Approximately half of the subjects agreed on a single manikin as the best approximation of the human for both the infant (46%) and child manikins (43%). Excluding assessments of stiffness “out of range”, the percentage of experts who agreed on a single manikin as the best approximation for the human increased to approximately 90% for each manikin size.

Conclusion

Experienced health care providers consistently identified and agreed on the manikin thorax stiffness which they felt best approximated downstroke chest compression stiffness of children and infants. Expert opinion can be used to create manikins with realistic spring stiffness for CPR training. Further study is needed to evaluate whether enhanced manikin biofidelity will improve CPR performance.

a Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

b Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

c Laerdal Medical, Stavanger, Norway

d Center for Simulation, Advanced Education and Innovation, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, USA

e Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, USA

f Research and Education, Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Center for Injury Research and Prevention, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Blvd., Suite 1150, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Tel.: +1 215 590 6075; fax: +1 215 590 5425.

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.07.005.

1 Formerly of affiliation ‘c’.

PII: S0300-9572(09)00374-8

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.07.005


View previous. 20 of 26 View next.