Resuscitation
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 175-182, February 2002

Calcium channel blockers as first line treatment for broad complex tachycardia with right bundle branch block: ingenuity or folly?

  • Jenn Chyuan Wang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore
  • ,
  • Swee Han Lim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +65-32-13558; fax: +65-22-60294
  • ,
  • Wee Siong Teo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore
  • ,
  • V Anantharaman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore

Received 23 April 2001; received in revised form 2 August 2001; accepted 21 August 2001.

Abstract 

Objective: To study the response of regular broad-complex tachycardia (BCT) demonstrating right bundle branch block (RBBB) to treatment in the Emergency department (ED). Methods: Retrospective chart review of management of patients with BCT, RBBB without a history of ischaemic heart disease. A diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT) was made if the ECG showed features such as atrioventricular dissociation, capture or fusion beats or if VT was demonstrated during electrophysiological studies (EPS). Results: A total of 25 patients were eligible. Nineteen patients were given intravenous (IV) calcium channel blockers (either verapamil or diltiazem), as first line treatment. Of these, 18 converted to sinus rhythm and the other one patient subsequently converted with amiodarone. The remaining six patients were given IV adenosine (n=3), lignocaine (n=2) or amiodarone (n=1) as first line treatment but none of them were converted. Of these, four of them converted with IV calcium channel blockers eventually. Of the other two patients, who were both given lignocaine initially, one deteriorated haemodynamically with the use of verapamil and required synchronised cardioversion to convert. The other patient did not respond to amiodarone and synchronised cardioversion but was subsequently converted with verapamil. The difference between the success rate of calcium channel blockers and other anti-arrhythmics is statistically significant (P<0.01 by Fischer's exact method). Fourteen cases had diagnoses of VT, including the two patients given lignocaine. Five cases were found to have supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant conduction. Six cases did not have confirmed diagnoses. Conclusion: In patients presenting with BCT and RBBB but without underlying ischaemic heart disease, there is evidence to suggest that calcium channel blockers could effectively be used as the treatment of choice.

Keywords:  Idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia, Resuscitation, Verapamil, Diltiazem, Lignocaine

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Presented in part at Society of Academic and Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, Boston, USA, May 1999.

PII: S0300-9572(01)00458-0

Resuscitation
Volume 52, Issue 2 , Pages 175-182, February 2002