Logo
Search for

Volume 81, Issue 1, Pages 36-41 (January 2010)


View previous. 9 of 35 View next.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients aged 35 years and under: A 4-year study of frequency and survival in London

Rachael T. Donohoe, Jennifer InnesCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Stephen Gadd, Mark Whitbread, Fionna Moore

Received 12 June 2009; received in revised form 18 August 2009; accepted 18 September 2009. published online 16 November 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The aim of this study was to describe the frequency and characteristics of cardiac arrest patients of 35 years and under attended by the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust between April 2003 and March 2007. Few large studies have described the occurrence, mechanism, resuscitation viability and outcome of this substantial subset of the cardiac arrest population. By documenting over 3000 cardiac arrests in young people we sought to improve understanding, awareness and ultimately survival of a condition notorious for high mortality rates.

Methods and results

Data were analysed for 3084 young cardiac arrest patients and reported retrospectively. Patients were categorised by age, gender, aetiology and whether or not resuscitation attempts were made.

Over 75% of patients were aged 18–35 years. There were significantly more males in this age group (p<0.001) compared to those aged 17 years or less. The most common cause of cardiac arrest was an underlying cardiac cause (44.9%). Overdoses, hanging and other suicides were found to be major causes of cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin in young adult males. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) was the most common known cause of death in infants aged less than 1 year. This age group received bystander CPR most often. 5.6% of young cardiac arrest patients who were taken to hospital survived to hospital discharge.

Conclusions

Mortality in young cardiac arrest patients remains high. Focus should be placed on tackling social and psychological causes of cardiac arrest as well as cardiac aetiologies.

Article Outline

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Methods

2.1. Study design

2.2. System overview

2.3. Data collection

2.4. Data analysis

3. Results

3.1. Frequency and characteristics

3.2. Location, witnessed and bystander CPR rates and presenting rhythm—patients who had resuscitation commenced

3.3. Patient outcomes—patients who had resuscitation commenced

4. Discussion

4.1. Limitations

5. Conclusion

Conflict of interest

Appendix A. Supplementary data

References

Copyright

1. Introduction 

return to Article Outline

The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust attends around 10,000 incidents of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest every year. Of these, approximately 8% involve patients aged 35 years and younger. The frequency of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in young people is relatively low compared to the total cardiac arrest population.1 However, there are few large studies that describe the occurrence, mechanism, resuscitation viability and outcome of these events, particularly in the young adult population.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 As the paediatric population and young people differ both from each other and from adults in the aetiology and pathophysiology of cardiac arrest1, 6 and associated mortality is high,1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 comprehensive epidemiological information is essential for the progression of treatment for young cardiac arrest patients and ultimately for improving outcome from this life threatening condition. This study aims to describe the frequency and characteristics of over 3000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the paediatric and young population in London over a 4-year period.

2. Methods 

return to Article Outline

2.1. Study design 

The study is a retrospective analysis of data collected by the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust for every out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient attended aged 35 years or younger. Data were collected for a total of 3084 patients between 1st April 2003 and 31st March 2007. Data are presented to allow the comparison of characteristics between different age groups within the paediatric and young adult cardiac arrest population.

2.2. System overview 

London represents the most populous urban centre in the European Union and is one of the largest cities in the developed world in terms of its built-up area. It has a population of 7.5 million, representing 12% of the UK total and equating to a density of 4699 people per km2 in a geographic area of 1579km2 (609 miles2). Approximately 4 million people are aged 35 years and under.9

London is served by the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, the largest emergency ambulance service in the world to provide healthcare that is free at the point of delivery. It responds to over 1 million calls per year and attends over 900,000 emergency incidents.10 Cardiac arrest calls are designated ‘Category A’ by the UK's Department of Health and are assigned the highest priority level to ensure the most rapid response. Vehicles responding to cardiac arrest emergency calls are equipped with automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and all operational staff operate to the Resuscitation Council (UK) Guidelines.11

The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust oversees a programme of public access AED deployment and provides training in their use. In 2007 around 425 public access AED units were deployed across 150 sites in London.

Limited knowledge of the symptoms of myocardial infarction and signs of cardiac arrest, as previously identified in London,12 reduces the speed of access to emergency medical care in some cases. As in many major cities, knowledge of bystander CPR has also been identified as an area for improvement.12 During the study period, the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust undertook public awareness campaigns and provided training to over 30,000 Londoners in community resuscitation.

2.3. Data collection 

Data were extracted from the clinical records completed by London Ambulance Service NHS Trust crews attending each out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. These records capture information including patient demographic details, location, bystander interventions, witnessed information and clinical observations. Variables were supplemented with information from the emergency call record. For each patient taken to hospital with resuscitation ongoing, attempts were made to obtain survival outcome information from the 32 receiving London Accident & Emergency Hospitals. All data items were obtained in accordance with relevant legislations governing the collection and use of patient data.

Based on the information from the clinical record and emergency call record, patients were categorised by age, aetiology and whether or not they were viable for resuscitation attempts. Aetiology groups included cardiac, trauma or other non-cardiac cause. Patients with no reported cardiac disease history were presumed to have suffered a cardiac arrest owing to an underlying cardiac condition unless there was information to suggest otherwise. Trauma and non-cardiac cases were sub-divided into further categories to allow a more detailed aetiology analysis. Patients were categorised as ‘not viable for resuscitation’ if their clinical record reported obvious signs of death (e.g. rigor mortis, post-mortem staining) and the attending crews did not make any resuscitation attempt.

2.4. Data analysis 

Population parameter statistics were generated to summarise and compare patient characteristics that met the study inclusion criteria. Patients were split in to two groups for data analysis by age. These were children (17 years or less) and adults (18–35 years). Since different characteristics were exhibited by children of different ages, those aged 17 or less were further divided into three groups; infants (under 1 year old), younger children (1–8 years) and older children (9–17 years). Frequency data were analysed with non-parametric Chi-squared tests and the Marasculio procedure for multiple comparisons using SPSS 16.0 (Chicago, USA). Multivariate regression analyses were used to identify possible predictors of survival.

3. Results 

return to Article Outline

During the 4-year study period, the London Ambulance Service NHS Trust attended a total of 39,373 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. 3084 (7.8%) of these were patients aged 35 years or younger. This equals an incidence of 131.2 cardiac arrests per 100,000 of the population of London per year, with an incidence of 19.3 per 100,000 for those aged 35 years or less. For those of cardiac aetiology where resuscitation was attempted, the incidence was 4.5 per 100,000 per year when patients were aged 35 years and under. The frequency of occurrence and characteristics of these patients are described below and in Table 1.

Table 1.

Frequency and characteristics of 3084 cardiac arrest patients both viable and not viable for resuscitation.

Cardiac
Non-cardiac
Trauma
All aetiology
Male,an (%b)Female,an (%b)Unknown,an (%b)Total,an (%c)Male,an (%b)Female,an (%b)Unknown,an (%b)Total,an (%c)Male,an (%b)Female,an (%b)Unknown,an (%b)Total,an (%c)Total,an (%)
Patients viable for resuscitation
Under 1 year93 (59.2)64 (40.8)0157 (21.7)61 (56.5)47 (43.5)0108 (20.5)3 (75.0)1 (25.0)04 (0.8)269 (15.4)
1–8 years45 (57.0)34 (43.0)079 (10.9)33 (67.3)16 (32.7)049 (9.3)16 (64.0)9 (36.0)025 (5.0)153 (8.8)
9–17 years31 (57.4)23 (42.6)054 (7.5)22 (48.9)23 (51.1)045 (8.5)36 (70.6)15 (29.4)051 (10.2)150 (8.6)
Under 18 years total169 (58.3)121 (41.7)0290 (40.2)116 (57.4)86 (42.6)0202 (38.3)55 (68.8)25 (31.2)080 (16.0)572 (32.7)
18–35 years316 (73.1)116 (26.9)0432 (59.8)210 (64.6)114 (35.1)1 (0.3)325 (61.7)333 (79.5)85 (20.3)1 (0.2)419 (84.0)1176 (67.3)
All ages485 (67.2)237 (32.8)0722 (100)326 (61.9)200 (38.0)1 (0.2)527 (100)388 (77.8)110 (22.0)1 (0.2)499 (100)1748 (100)

Patients not viable for resuscitation
Under 1 year7 (26.9)16 (61.5)3 (11.5)26 (3.9)10 (40.0)15 (60.0)025 (1.9)02 (100)02 (0.5)53 (4.0)
1–8 years11 (45.8)12 (50.0)1 (4.2)24 (3.6)1 (25.0)3 (75.0)04 (0.3)1 (20.0)4 (80.0)05 (1.2)33 (2.5)
9–17 years17 (65.4)9 (34.6)026 (3.9)1 (33.3)1 (33.3)1 (33.3)3 (0.2)11 (64.7)6 (35.3)017 (4.0)46 (3.4)
Under 18 years total35 (46.1)37 (48.7)4 (5.3)76 (11.5)12 (37.5)19 (59.4)1 (3.1)32 (2.4)12 (50.0)12 (50.0)024 (5.6)132 (9.9)
18–35 years437 (74.4)121 (20.6)29 (4.9)587 (88.5)158 (73.1)53 (24.5)5 (2.3)216 (16.2)284 (70.8)91 (22.7)26 (6.5)401 (94.4)1204 (90.1)
All ages472 (71.2)158 (23.8)33 (5.0)663 (100)170 (68.5)72 (29.0)6 (2.4)248 (100)296 (69.6)103 (24.2)26 (6.1)425 (100)1336 (100)

All patientsd957 (31)395 (12.8)33 (1.1)1385 (44.9)496 (16.1)272 (8.8)7 (0.2)775 (25)684 (22.2)213 (6.9)27 (0.9)924 (30)3084 (100)
a

Gender.

b

Percentage of each sex within the age group and aetiology.

c

Percentage of cases in the age group within the aetiology.

d

Percentage of cases in the aetiology group within the total.

3.1. Frequency and characteristics 

Cardiac arrest occurred more frequently among adults (18–35 years) (n=2380, 77.2%) than among children (17 years or less) (n=703, 22.8%). Nearly half of the cardiac arrests among children occurred in the infant group (n=321, 45.7%; 10.4% of the complete dataset). Fig. 1 illustrates frequency of cardiac arrest per year of age.


View full-size image.

Fig. 1. Number of cardiac arrests per year of age.


Table 1 presents the patients categorised by aetiology, age, gender and whether they received resuscitation attempts from the ambulance crew.

The most common cause of cardiac arrest was a presumed cardiac condition (n=1384; 44.9%). 30% (n=924) of arrests were due to trauma and 25.1% (n=775) were of another non-cardiac cause. Adults were significantly more likely to have a traumatic cardiac arrest than children (34.5% vs. 14.8%; χ2 (1, n=3084)=99.3, p<0.001).

Over two thirds of all patients in the study were male (n=2179; 70.0%). The adult group contained a significantly higher percentage of males in comparison to the group of children (75.0% vs. 57.4%, χ2=80.85, p<0.001).

Just over half of all patients were viable for resuscitation (n=1748; 56.7%). Of these, the largest aetiology group was presumed cardiac (41.3%; n=722). The proportion of patients for whom resuscitation was attempted was higher in the younger age groups. 83.5% (n=269) of infants (under 1 year old), 82.3% (n=153) of children (1–8 years) and 76.5% (n=150) of adolescents (9–17 years) received resuscitation attempts from the ambulance crew. In sharp contrast, only 49.4% (n=1176) of adult patients (18–35 years) received resuscitation attempts. In fact, 18–35 year olds accounted for 90.1% of all patients for whom resuscitation was not commenced.

There was a significantly higher proportion of presumed cardiac aetiology arrests among the group of patients who did not have resuscitation undertaken, compared to those who did (49.6% vs. 41.3%, χ2=7.82, p=0.005).

Patients who had a cardiac arrest of a non-cardiac (non-traumatic) cause were significantly more likely to receive resuscitative efforts than not (30.1% vs. 18.6%, χ2=53.4, p<0.001).

For all cardiac arrests of a traumatic or other non-cardiac origin, the specific cause of arrest was explored. A breakdown is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Breakdown of the most common underlying causes cardiac arrests of a traumatic or other non-cardiac origin.

Age group
Total, n
Under 1 year1–8 years9–17 years18–35 years
Male,an (%)Female,an (%)Unknown,an (%)Male,an (%)Female,an (%)Unknown,an (%)Male,an (%)Female,an (%)Unknown,an (%)Male,an (%)Female,an (%)Unknown,an (%)
Non-cardiac aetiology
Overdose0000003 (1.1)2 (0.7)0196 (73.4)59 (22.1)7 (2.6)267
Respiratory6 (8)5 (6.7)06 (8)2 (2.7)06 (8)7 (9.3)1 (1.3)22 (29.3)20 (26.7)075
Seizure1 (2)2 (4)01 (2)1 (2)02 (4)0032 (64)10 (20)1 (2)50
SIDS29 (56.9)22 (43.1)000000000051
Terminal illness3 (9.4)1 (3.1)02 (6.3)3 (9.4)001 (3.1)014 (43.8)8 (25)032
Miscellaneous31 (10.3)32 (10.7)1 (0.3)25 (8.3)13 (4.3)011 (3.7)14 (4.7)1 (0.3)98 (32.7)70 (23.3)4 (1.3)300

Total70 (9)62 (8)1 (0.1)34 (4.4)19 (2.5)022 (2.8)24 (3.1)2 (0.3)362 (46.7)167 (21.5)12 (1.5)775

Traumatic aetiology
Assault00001 (3.1)03 (9.4)0020 (62.5)7 (21.9)1 (3.1)32
Electrocution0000000009 (69.2)1 (7.7)3 (23.1)13
Fall01 (1.4)04 (5.6)2 (2.8)03 (4.2)1 (1.4)044 (62)13 (18.3)3 (4.2)71
Fire0002 (20)2 (20)001 (10)03 (30)1 (10)1 (10)10
Hanging0000005 (2.2)7 (3)0163 (70.6)49 (21.2)7 (3)231
Road traffic incident01 (0.4)04 (1.7)5 (2.1)1 (0.4)19 (8.1)7 (3)1 (0.4)147 (62.3)44 (18.6)7 (3)236
Shooting00000001 (2.9)031 (91.2)2 (5.9)034
Stabbing0000008 (8.7)1 (1.1)1 (1.1)69 (75)11 (12)2 (2.2)92
Drowning0001 (6.3)001 (6.3)008 (50)5 (31.3)1 (6.3)16
Suicideb0000002 (2)1 (1)065 (65)26 (26)6 (6)100
Miscellaneous3 (3.4)1 (1.1)06 (6.7)2 (2.2)04 (4.5)2 (2.2)050 (56.2)16 (18)5 (5.6)89

Total3 (0.3)3 (0.3)017 (1.8)12 (1.3)1 (0.1)45 (4.9)21 (2.3)2 (0.2)609 (65.9)175 (18.9)36 (3.9)924
a

Gender.

b

Not including hanging.

The single most common cause of non-cardiac (non-traumatic) cardiac arrest was overdose and these patients accounted for 34.5% (n=267) of this group. The vast majority (98.1%; n=262) were aged 18–35 years. Three times as many males as females suffered a cardiac arrest from overdosing (199 vs. 61) (Table 2).

Respiratory compromise was the second most common cause of non-cardiac (non-traumatic) arrest (Table 2). 88% received resuscitation attempts.

There were 51 cases of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) which accounted for 15.8% of all arrests in the infant group. Resuscitation was attempted in 68.6% of cases.

The single most common cause of traumatic cardiac arrest was road traffic incidents (25.5%), closely followed by hangings (25%) (Table 2). 65% of road traffic incident patients received resuscitative efforts. In contrast, resuscitation was only attempted in 34% of those whose arrest was due to hanging. Interestingly, the vast majority of hangings (70.6%; n=163) were adult males (Table 2).

10.8% (n=100) of traumatic cardiac arrests were attributed to suicide (e.g. jumping from a height; excluding hanging). Males aged 18–35 years accounted for the majority of traumatic suicide cases (65%; n=65).

Stabbings accounted for a total of 10% (n=92) of traumatic arrests. Most of these patients were aged 18–35 years (89.1%; n=82) with 10.9% (n=10) aged 9–17 years. 82% (n=75) of patients who were stabbed received resuscitative efforts. Those that were deemed not viable for resuscitation were exclusive to the 18–35 year age group (Table 2).

3.2. Location, witnessed and bystander CPR rates and presenting rhythm—patients who had resuscitation commenced 

Further information about location of cardiac arrest, witnessed status and bystander CPR was collected for the 1748 patients for whom resuscitation was started (Table 3).

Table 3.

Bystander witnessed, crew witnessed and bystander CPR rates for patients for whom resuscitation was commenced.

Age group
Total
Under 1 year1–8 years9–17 years18–35 years
Number of patients (for whom information is known)23014012110201511
Witnessed, n (%)73 (31.7)54 (38.6)63 (52.1)518 (50.8)708 (46.9)
Bystander witnessed, n (%)59 (25.7)47 (33.6)51 (42.1)366 (35.9)523 (34.6)
Crew witnessed, n (%)14 (6.1)7 (5.0)12 (9.9)152 (14.9)185 (12.2)
Bystander CPR, na (%)105/268 (39.2)59/153 (38.6)49/150 (32.7)288/1175 (33.0)601/1746 (34.4)
Bystander witnessed patients who received bystander CPR, nb (%)36/59 (61)24/47 (48.9)27/51 (52.9)201/366 (54.9)288/523 (55.1)
a

Denominator is the number of patients for whom this information was recorded.

b

Denominator is the number of bystander witnessed arrests.

Of the 952 patients for whom location information was available, 65.4% of cardiac arrests occurred in private locations (e.g. home or nursing home) and 34.6% occurred in public (e.g. street, work).

In total 46.9% of patients aged 35 years and under had their cardiac arrest witnessed by a bystander (34.6%) or ambulance crews (12.2%). The rates of bystander witnessed arrests were lowest in the infant group at 25.7% (Fig. 2 and Table 3). Fig. 2 shows the percentage of witnessed and unwitnessed cardiac arrests for all age groups.


View full-size image.

Fig. 2. Witnessed and unwitnessed arrests by age group.


There was a significant trend in the occurrence of bystander CPR by age group. 39.2% of infants, 38.6% of younger children, 32.7% of elder children and 33.0% of adults received bystander CPR (χ2 for trend=4.39, p=0.03). Prior to the arrival of ambulance crews, a total of 34.4% of patients viable for resuscitation received bystander CPR (Table 3). Of those that were bystander witnessed, bystander CPR was given in 55.1% of cases. The rate of bystander CPR remained constant over the 4-year study period.

The presenting rhythm was obtained for 1363 patients who had resuscitation commenced. Of these, 162 (11.9%) presented with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT). The remainder presented with asystole (68.6%), PEA (17.8%), or other rhythm (1.8%). The frequency of VF/VT was lowest for those aged under 1 year (no occurrences), 1.8% for those aged 1–8 years, 13.9% for those aged 18–35 years and highest for those aged 9–17 (16.1%). There were no differences in median response times for patients who presented in VF versus those who did not; emergency call to arrival at scene and emergency call to arrival at patient times were 6 and 7min, respectively for those aged 1–35 years. Median response times were slightly quicker for infants (under 1 year) at 5 and 6min, respectively.

3.3. Patient outcomes—patients who had resuscitation commenced 

The total number of patients aged 35 years and under achieving a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following treatment for cardiac arrest and whilst still in the field was 126 (7.2%) (Table 4). There was a significant difference in the proportion of ROSC between the age groups (p=0.03). The highest frequency of ROSC was seen in those aged 9–17 years (10.0%) and the lowest in those aged 1–8 (2.0%). There was a significant difference between these two groups (p<0.05) and between those aged 1–8 years and 18–35 years (p<0.001 using the Marascuilo procedure for multiple comparisons) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Rates of ROSC and survival for patients for whom resuscitation was commenced.

Age group
Total
Under 1 year1–8 years9–17 years18–35 years
Number of patients26915315011761748
ROSC, n (%)14 (5.2)3 (2.0)15 (10.0)94 (8.0)126 (7.2)
Survival status unknown, n (%)142 (52.8)83 (54.2)98 (65.3)718 (61.1)1041 (59.8)
Survival status known, n (%)127 (47.2)70 (45.8)52 (34.7)458 (38.9)707 (40.4)
Survived to hospital discharge,an (%)5 (3.9)4 (5.7)4 (7.7)27 (5.9)40 (5.7)
Expired in field,an (%)14 (11.0)8 (11.4)5 (9.6)91 (19.9)118 (16.7)
Died in hospital,an (%)108 (85.0)58 (82.9)43 (82.7)340 (74.2)549 (77.7)
a

Denominator used for the calculation of percentages is the number of patients for whom the survival outcome was known.

As a result of missing documentation and difficulties in obtaining data from some hospitals, it was not possible to track survival data for over half of the patients for whom resuscitation was commenced (59.2%). The survival to hospital discharge rate for patients for whom data were available was 5.6% (n=40/713). Survival was not significantly different across age groups (p=0.90). It ranged from 3.9% for those aged under 1 year to 7.7% for those aged 18–35 years (Table 4). A multivariate analysis revealed that patients presenting with asystole were significantly less likely to survive (p=0.009, OR, 0.261; CI, 0.095 to 0.712) to hospital discharge than those presenting with VF/VT.

4. Discussion 

return to Article Outline

This is the largest known study to focus specifically on the frequency and characteristics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients aged 35 years and under. Previous studies have focused on smaller paediatric populations,3, 4, 8 smaller young adult populations13 or larger adult populations.1, 14, 15 Examining cardiac arrests unique to young people provides a useful insight to a population less frequently featured in epidemiological studies.

Patients aged 35 years and under accounted for 7.8% of the total occurrence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in London during the 4-year study period. The incidence of 19.3 per 100,000 is high in comparison to previous studies8, 16 and may suggest that others have previously underestimated the prevalence of cardiac arrests in young people.

Within this population of 3084 patients, differences were found in the frequency and characteristics of cardiac arrest across age groups and gender. These merit further consideration and exploration by health care professionals and the resuscitation community from both a preventative and treatment perspective.

Over three quarters (77.2%) of all cardiac arrests occurred in those aged 18–35 years. The largest aetiology group for these patients was cardiac which may suggest that cardiac risk factors have started to become influential in those younger than previously expected. Although major increases in the occurrence of heart disease are not thought to begin until the age of 35,17 some studies have reported onset at an earlier age with the development of risk factors occurring during childhood and adolescence18 with manifestation from the age of 18 years.19 Wisten et al.20 stressed the importance of using autopsy information to better understand the mechanism of cardiac arrest, particularly in the young. It is important to note that without autopsy information and in the absence of another clear cause of death, there is a risk of exaggeration of cardiac aetiologies in this study. Although conclusive diagnoses would have been valuable, with autopsy rates in decline21 it is unlikely that we would have obtained such data for all patients in the study.

Studies focusing on adult populations have shown that males are more likely to suffer a cardiac arrest than females.14, 15 Cardiovascular risk factors such as smoking obesity, high blood pressure, high total cholesterol and low HDL cholesterol have been shown to be more prominent in men.14 At 72.4%, the proportion of males in the 18–35 year old group was significantly higher (p<0.001) than in the under 18 years group (Table 2). In the under 18 group, cardiac arrests of cardiac aetiology were more prevalent in males than in females which is consistent with the findings of others1, 3, 4 although there remains limited physiological explanation for this.4, 8

90.1% of all patients within the study population deemed beyond resuscitation were aged 18–35 years (Table 2). Adults in cardiac arrest may be discovered less quickly than children who are, generally, more consistently supervised.

The relatively high contribution of hanging, other suicide and overdose incidents in the 18–35 year age group is a worrying statistic. It highlights an area where intervention at the prevention stage is essential to improving mortality in the young adult population (Table 3). These statistics are particularly poignant for males who accounted for vast majority of these cases. National figures report that between the ages of 20 and 24 years, men are more than four times more likely than women to commit suicide.22

Infant patients accounted for a relatively high number of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (10.4%) despite belonging to an age group of only 1 year in duration (Table 1).

The prevalence of SIDS in this study supports the concept that further investigation is warranted23 (Table 3).

Although the number of patients suffering a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was lowest in those aged under 1 year, this group received the highest levels of bystander CPR (39.2%) (Table 4). Discovering an infant in cardiac arrest would likely prompt immediate resuscitation attempts in comparison to a young adult patient who may be discovered by chance. The occurrence of bystander CPR was comparable to previous findings8, 24 or slightly lower.4, 6

The occurrence of VF/VT seen for patients for whom resuscitation was commenced was less frequent than that seen in other studies.6, 8, 13 This may be attributable to the large number of trauma and other non-cardiac causes of cardiac arrest in the young adult group.

The overall median response time to arrival at patient was 7min, which is comparable to previous reports.6, 25

Based on available data, this study reports a survival to hospital discharge rate of 5.6% which is consistent with previous findings for similar age groups.6 The outcome information available for children (under 18 years) was limited in comparison to the young adult group and may provide a less meaningful statistic.

Results of a multivariate analysis showed that a presenting rhythm of VF/VT was a predictor of survival for those aged 35 years and under, something which is consistent with previous findings6, 7, 13, 26 and adult studies.6, 15, 26

4.1. Limitations 

Although the sample size of patients aged 35 years and under was the largest known of its kind, survival outcome retrieval was low and limits the conclusions that can be drawn regarding factors associated with increased survival. Additionally, information from autopsy reports would have greatly increased the accuracy of aetiology allocation and reduced the risk of over reporting the number of cases assigned a cardiac origin.

5. Conclusion 

return to Article Outline

Mortality in young cardiac arrest patients remains high. Young adult males appear to be at particular risk from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of both cardiac and non-cardiac aetiologies. Focus should be placed on tackling social and psychological causes of cardiac arrest as well as cardiac aetiologies.

Conflict of interest 

return to Article Outline

There are no conflicts of interest related to this study.

Appendix A. Supplementary data 

return to Article Outline

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Young KD, Seidel JS. Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a collective review. Ann Emerg Med. 1999;33:195–205. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (87 KB) | CrossRef

2. 2Zaritsky A, Nadkarni V, Hazinski MF, et al. Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of pediatric advanced life support: the pediatric utstein style. Circulation. 1995;92:2006–2020. MEDLINE

3. 3Lopez-Herce J, Garcia C, Dominguez P, et al. Characteristics and outcome of cardiorespiratory arrest in children. Resuscitation. 2004;63:311–313. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (187 KB) | CrossRef

4. 4Herlitz J, Engdahl J, Svensson L, Young M, Angquist KA, Holmberg S. Characteristics and outcome among children suffering from out of hospital cardiac arrest in Sweden. Resuscitation. 2005;64:37–40. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (59 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5Donoghue AJ, Nadkarni V, Berg RA, et al. Out-of-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest: an epidemiologic review and assessment of current knowledge. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;46:512–522. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (267 KB) | CrossRef

6. 6Herlitz J, Svensson L, Engdahl J, et al. Characteristics of cardiac arrest and resuscitation by age group: an analysis from the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Registry. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25:1025–1031. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (146 KB) | CrossRef

7. 7Lopez-Herce J, Garcia C, Dominguez P, et al. Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiorespiratory arrest in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005;21:807–815.

8. 8Gerein RB, Osmond MH, Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Burns S. What are the etiology and epidemiology of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest in Ontario, Canada?. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:653–658. CrossRef

9. 9UK Statistics Authority. http://www.statistics.gov.uk [accessed August 2008].

10. 10London Ambulance Service. Facts and figures. http://www.londonambulance.nhs.uk/aboutus/facts/facts.html [accessed August 2008].

11. 11© Resuscitation Council (UK); 2008. http://www.resus.org.uk [accessed August 2008].

12. 12Donohoe R, Haefeli K, Moore F. Public perceptions and experiences of myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and CPR in London. Resuscitation. 2006;71:70–79. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (124 KB) | CrossRef

13. 13Safranek DJ, Eisenberg MS, Larsen MP. The epidemiology of cardiac arrest in young adults. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:1102–1106. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (823 KB) | CrossRef

14. 14Jousilahti P, Vartiainen E, Tuomilehto J, Puska P. Sex, age, cardiovascular risk factors, and coronary heart disease. A prospective follow-up study of 14,786 middle aged men and women in Finland. Circulation. 1999;99:1165–1172. MEDLINE

15. 15Kim C, Fahrenbruch CE, Cobb LA, Eisenberg MS. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in men and women. Circulation. 2001;104:2699–2703. CrossRef

16. 16Atwood C, Eisenberg MS, Herlitz J, Rea TD. Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation. 2005;67:75–80. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (188 KB) | CrossRef

17. 17Department of Health, New York State. Coronary heart disease information. http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/heart/aboutchd.htm [accessed August 2008]

18. 18Viikari JS, Niinikoski H, Juonala M, et al. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in children and young adults. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2004;93:34–42. MEDLINE

19. 19Navas-Nacher EL, Colangelo L, Beam C, Greenland P. Risk factors for coronary heart disease in men 18–39 years of age. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:433–439. MEDLINE

20. 20Wisten A, Forsberg H, Krantz P, Messner T. Sudden cardiac death in 15–35 year olds in Sweden during 1992–1999. J Intern Med. 2002;252:529–536. MEDLINE | CrossRef

21. 21Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology. 2005;47:551–559. MEDLINE

22. 22National Institute for Mental Health in England. National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England. Annual report on progress; 2006. http://www.nimhe.csip.org.uk/our-work/suicide-prevention/annual-report-on-progress-2006.html [accessed August 2008].

23. 23Krous HF, Beckwith JB, Byard RW, et al. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and unclassified Sudden Infant Deaths (USID): a definitional and diagnostic approach. Pediatrics. 2004;114:234–238.

24. 24Young KD, Gausche-Hill M, McClung CD, Lewis RJ. A prospective, population-based study of the epidemiology and outcome of out-of-hospital pediatric cardiopulmonary arrest. Pediatrics. 2004;114:157–164.

25. 25Kuisma M, Suominen P, Korpela R. Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests—epidemiology and outcome. Resuscitation. 1995;30:141–150. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (769 KB) | CrossRef

26. 26Nadkarni VM, Larkin GL, Peberdy MA, et al. First documented rhythm and clinical outcome from in-hospital cardiac arrest among children and adults. JAMA. 2006;295:50–57. CrossRef

Clinical Audit and Research Unit, London Ambulance Service NHS Trust, 8-20 Pocock Street, London SE1 0BW, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 0207 783 2502; fax: +44 0207 783 2519.

 A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.021.

PII: S0300-9572(09)00497-3

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.09.021


View previous. 9 of 35 View next.